2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2006.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation relationship between austenite and bainite in a multiphased steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The section of the ODF at u 2 = 45 deg generated starting from copper oriented grains using final activity criterion (with a tolerance of 15 deg) is shown on the first section of Figure 5(a). The general trend of the local texture measurements in steels, published by Cabus et al, [27] is reproduced by the simulation results. Particularly, the rotated Goss orientation (110)h110i (lower left corner) disappears according to experimental transformation products.…”
Section: Deformed Materialssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The section of the ODF at u 2 = 45 deg generated starting from copper oriented grains using final activity criterion (with a tolerance of 15 deg) is shown on the first section of Figure 5(a). The general trend of the local texture measurements in steels, published by Cabus et al, [27] is reproduced by the simulation results. Particularly, the rotated Goss orientation (110)h110i (lower left corner) disappears according to experimental transformation products.…”
Section: Deformed Materialssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The results obtained from copper oriented grains are compared with measurements published by Cabus et al, [27] where the (110)h110i (rotated Goss) orientation is present, which was absent on the no-RX range deformed material. The general trend of experimental data is reproduced by the simulation and they suggest that a variant selection mechanism is more intense when the austenite is deformed before the phase transformation than recrystallized.…”
Section: Recrystallized Materialsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Note that KS variants share parallel close-packed planes (CPs) and parallel close-packed direction (CDs) with the parent grain. However, ORs intermediate between KS and NW are usually measured in steels from EBSD and TEM experimental studies [e.g., [37][38][39].…”
Section: Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This detailed study will focus mostly on those retained austenite grains that had a neighbour transformation product with the misorientation angle within the 0-5°interval. A higher tolerance angle might improve the statistics of the results and in studies where it is investigated if a certain misorientation relationship is followed, such as studies on selective growth during recrystallization or when spreads around ideal texture components are applied, often a higher tolerance angle such as 10°3 8,49) or 15°, [50][51][52] the latter one corresponding to the maximum misorientation of a low angle grain boundary, is used. In this case, however, a tolerance angle of 5°was chosen because this tolerance is, as was illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Variant Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%