2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin, transport and deposition of aerosol iron to Australian coastal waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
28
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
13
28
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The FFeS results reported in this section are similar to data reported by Winton et al [28] for aerosols collected at a coastal site in the Northern Territory (Australia) (2-12%) and lie in the lower range of solubilities observed in Tasmania (0.5-56%) [29]. The labile fraction of Fe in aerosols collected at Mission Beach is similar to those reported in aerosols collected at sea during the same period (4-33%) [68]. Our results are higher than those reported by Mackie et al [57] for readily soluble Fe (dissolving in the time range from minutes to hours) from soil samples collected in Thargomindah in Southwest Queensland (0.9 ± 0.3%).…”
Section: Iron Solubilitysupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The FFeS results reported in this section are similar to data reported by Winton et al [28] for aerosols collected at a coastal site in the Northern Territory (Australia) (2-12%) and lie in the lower range of solubilities observed in Tasmania (0.5-56%) [29]. The labile fraction of Fe in aerosols collected at Mission Beach is similar to those reported in aerosols collected at sea during the same period (4-33%) [68]. Our results are higher than those reported by Mackie et al [57] for readily soluble Fe (dissolving in the time range from minutes to hours) from soil samples collected in Thargomindah in Southwest Queensland (0.9 ± 0.3%).…”
Section: Iron Solubilitysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The mean flux of labile Fe in this study was 0.213 ± 0.107 µmol m −2 day −1 , which is lower than results of marine aerosols collected at sea (Coral Sea Marine Region) during the same time period, 0.303 ± 0.590 µmol m −2 day −1 [68] calculated based on the same deposition velocity. Fluxes reported in this case are also similar to the lower results reported by Winton et al [28] for Northern Territory, 0.2 ± 0.1-4 ± 2 µmol m −2 day −1 (also calculated for the same deposition velocity).…”
Section: Estimation Of Fe Deposition Fluxescontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A higher FFeS was observed in aerosol containing fresh bushfire emissions from both Gingin and GI sites, where the labile Fe fraction contributed 3.8 and 4.0% of total Fe, respectively. The Fe solubility reported here is lower than reported for aerosols collected along the south and north sector of Western Australia's coast, where the fraction of labile Fe ranged from 7% to 16% (median 8%) and from 3% to 15% (median 5%), respectively [69]. However, aerosols analysed by Perron et al [69] were collected at sea on a research vessel, while aerosols analysed here were collected on land.…”
Section: Ironcontrasting
confidence: 59%