Original Sin and the Facts of Palaeoanthropology.

Blaber, Richard Michael

doi:10.31235/osf.io/jufqs

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This author has elsewhere discussed the Christian doctrine of 'original sin' and attempted to disprove it (see Blaber, 2023). It is on this doctrine that the Christian idea of the atonement is based.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Was Jesus Crucified, and If So, When?

Blaber¹

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The historicity of Jesus himself may be certain enough, but little else concerning him is. This paper will question the historical veracity of the Gospel narratives regarding the crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth, asking if it took place at all, and if so, when, given that its location was as the Gospels state. It will also examine the issue of his birth, showing that Matthew’s account cannot be relied on, and Luke’s is more accurate historically

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Was Jesus Crucified, and If So, When?

Blaber¹

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Here, the regions of the excavated depression and inside rocks are outlined manually by brown and red lines (Figure 1C) for preparation. Second, based on the digital image correlation (DIC) algorithm (Blaber, 2023), the same depression region and rocks in the CamA image are matched automatically (Figure 1D). The size of the whole picture (Figures 1A, B) is 2048 × 2048 pixel.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

New Advances in Lunar and Related Planetary Studies

Zhang

2024

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Frontiers is more than just an open access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone is not enough to realize our grand goals. Frontiers journal seriesThe Frontiers journal series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of openaccess, online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven by researchers for researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly community. At the same time, the Frontiers journal series operates on a revolutionary invention, the tiered publishing system, initially addressing specific communities of scholars, and gradually climbing up to broader public understanding, thus serving the interests of the lay society, too. Dedication to qualityEach Frontiers article is a landmark of the highest quality, thanks to genuinely collaborative interactions between authors and review editors, who include some of the world's best academicians. Research must be certified by peers before entering a stream of knowledge that may eventually reach the public -and shape society; therefore, Frontiers only applies the most rigorous and unbiased reviews. Frontiers revolutionizes research publishing by freely delivering the most outstanding research, evaluated with no bias from both the academic and social point of view. By applying the most advanced information technologies, Frontiers is catapulting scholarly publishing into a new generation. What are Frontiers Research Topics?Frontiers Research Topics are very popular trademarks of the Frontiers journals series: they are collections of at least ten articles, all centered on a particular subject. With their unique mix of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Frontiers Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area.

show abstract

“…It should not really need pointing out that neither Jews nor Muslims accept the doctrine, which is also rejected by Unitarians, soonce again -McGrath is not doing a great deal for multi-faith dialogue, which does not appear to be a priority for him (see McGrath, 1993, pp.113-114) 4 . For more on the subject of original sin, and the present author's refutation of the doctrine, see Blaber (2023).…”

Section: 'Barth's Critique Is Actually Directed Against a Specific Un...mentioning

confidence: 99%

In Defence of the Coherence of the Concept of God.

Blaber¹

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper will outline an idea of ‘God’ that may be rationally defensible, and will seek to defend it against possible objections. The idea will not, however, be the orthodox one of Trinitarian Christianity, but that of Unitarianism, Judaism and Islam. It will also not seek to defend the idea of God’s omnibenevolence, arguing that the existence of evil and suffering in the world tells against the attribution of that moral quality, at least as understood by humans, to God. The belief that evil and suffering in the world is decisive proof of God’s non-existence will be refuted.

show abstract

Original Sin and the Facts of Palaeoanthropology.

Cited by 4 publications

References 32 publications

Was Jesus Crucified, and If So, When?

Was Jesus Crucified, and If So, When?

New Advances in Lunar and Related Planetary Studies

In Defence of the Coherence of the Concept of God.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About