Condition-dependence is a fundamental concept in sexual selection research. Costs of mate choice (in terms of time, energy, and opportunity) necessitate benefits that outweigh these costs. A major group of benefits arises from condition-dependence, which means the adjustment of signals to the physiological state of the individual, as a consequence of the costs of expressing elaborate signal values (Penn & Számadó, 2020). Condition-dependence may link signal expression to the additive genetic background of condition (Rowe & Houle, 1996), thereby building a connection between mate choice and adaptation to the prevailing environment (Lorch et al., 2003), at the same time also lessening the chance that directional selection by mate choice depletes the additive genetic variance of the signal (Tomkins et al., 2004). Recent research of condition-dependent signals has brought new suggestions for general mechanisms connecting organismal performance and signal expression (Emlen et al., 2012; Koch et al., 2017; Lailvaux & Irschick, 2006). Another promising direction might be the use of overarching, multidimensional approaches to condition (Milot et al., 2014). At the same time, a tendency is seen for the preservation (Labocha & Hayes, 2012), reinstatement (Schulte-Hostedde et al., 2005), and reinterpretation (Salin et al., 2015) of classical condition measures. All of these developments make sense only if we (a) clarify the timing and mechanism of signal production and (b) also take into account the possibility that signal expression may feed back to condition, for example, through resource acquisition (Klug et al., 2010) or aggression by conspecifics (Webster et al., 2018).