2016
DOI: 10.1007/jhep04(2016)132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthosymplectic Chern-Simons matrix model and chirality projection

Abstract: Abstract:Recently it was found that the density matrix for a certain orthosymplectic Chern-Simons theory matches with that for the ABJM theory with the odd chiral projection. We prove this fact for a general case with the inclusion of fractional branes. We also identify the first few diagonal Gopakumar-Vafa invariants for the grand potential constructed from the chirally projected density matrix.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(136 reference statements)
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to see whether the results of these theories are given by the chiral projection [56][57][58] or not. The study would give us a deeper understanding of the instanton effects.…”
Section: Jhep08(2017)003mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is interesting to see whether the results of these theories are given by the chiral projection [56][57][58] or not. The study would give us a deeper understanding of the instanton effects.…”
Section: Jhep08(2017)003mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our strategy to derive the closed string formalism for the partition function of the (2, 2) model is completely parallel to that of the ABJM theory in [57,58,65], only except that we have to repeat it twice. Namely, we utilize the following two techniques.…”
Section: 1 Exact Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As in the N = 6 case, for k ≫ N 1/5 , the M-theory circle shrinks and the M-theory is well approximated by type IIA string on AdS 4 × CP 3 /Z 2 with the B-field holonomy B 2 ∼ M/k. There are some checks of this correspondence at classical level [60,61] and one-loop level [44,[62][63][64][65][66][67].…”
Section: Jhep11(2017)190mentioning
confidence: 99%