Os Desafios Da Saúde Digital Na Pandemia De Covid-19: Uma Revisão Integrativa No Scielo

Figueiredo, Eric Renato Lima; Godói, Isabella Piassi Dias; Campos, Alessandro Torres; Campos, Ana Cristina Viana

doi:10.53612/recisatec.v2i1.82

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When addressing the dimensions “Technical,” “Short-Term Results” and “Medium-Term Results,” in their respective indicators, the accomplished validation of the instrument reaffirms Figueiredo et al ( 73 ) in relation to the need for an assessment that contributes to understanding and reflecting on the risks and potential of digital health, considering important aspects of questions such as access, quality of the provided service, reliability and confidentiality of records, as well as public and governmental acceptability of the different employed ICTs.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 68%

Preparation and validation of the instrument “QualiAPS digital—Brazil” for assessing digital health care in primary health care: a required tool

de Figueirêdo,

de Siqueira Silva,

de Araújo

et al. 2024

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe use of Information and Communication Technologies in the field of health is increasing across the world, demarcating the field of digital health. The goal of this study is to formulate and validate a matrix of indicators, design assessment scripts and indicate data collection techniques for assessing the quality of digital health care in Brazilian Primary Health Care (PHC).MethodologyThis is a validation study divided into three phases: preparation of the instrument, analysis of validity and pilot study. The instrument was prepared based on the PHC assessment model from a literature review; the analysis of validity used the Delphi technique associated with the nominal group and the evidence from the literature reference. In the pilot study, audio-recorded interviews were conducted with strategic primary care actors.ResultsThe matrix of indicators “QualiAPS Digital—Brazil” introduces a set of 37 indicators, distributed into three distinct components and their respective dimensions. The component “Structure” includes the dimension “Resources”; the component “Processes” includes the dimensions “Technical,” “Organizational” and “Relational”; and the component “Results” includes the dimensions “Short-Term Results” and “Medium-Term Results.” The general values obtained for CVI and IRR were 0.89 and 1.00; respectively. Therefore, it was possible to design assessment scripts and indicate qualitative data collection techniques for assessing digital health in Brazilian PHC.ConclusionThe instrument presented was validated regarding its relevance, content and theoretical support to evaluate the quality of digital health care, supporting decision-making by managers and health professionals in the search for improving remote primary care provided to the population.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 68%