2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteoinductive activity of biphasic calcium phosphate with different rhBMP-2 doses in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Jang et al assessed BCP loaded with different doses of rhBMP-2 in critical-sized calvarial defects in rats. Percentages of new bone were significantly greater in the rhBMP-2-treated groups than in the pure BCP group [18]. These results indicated BCP was a good carrier and scaffold for rhBMP-2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jang et al assessed BCP loaded with different doses of rhBMP-2 in critical-sized calvarial defects in rats. Percentages of new bone were significantly greater in the rhBMP-2-treated groups than in the pure BCP group [18]. These results indicated BCP was a good carrier and scaffold for rhBMP-2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…BCP could promote adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of osteocytes [16,17]. However, pure BCP has limited bone regeneration capacity; the bioactivity could be enhanced by growth factors such as recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) [18]. In another way, BCP is a good carrier for rhBMP-2 owing to excellent biocompatibility, biomechanics, high porosity and pore structure [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To clarify, BCP is a combination of HA and ␤-TCP and has been widely applied in clinical and research fields because of its capacity for osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity. 37,38 The results of the study showed that the residual biomaterials occupied a large portion of newly formed bone area in the BCP sites, and all CCP sites showed no residual biomaterials. This could be due to the HA composition of BCP and the difference of particle size between BCP and CCP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This would mean that, in order to assess growth factor synergy, the volume of the chambers should be enlarged to a size where vascularisation is critical for bone formation. Furthermore, the concentration of BMP-2 was based on findings in the literature (Jang et al, 2012), and was supraphysiological. Together with the confined space offered by the chamber, this may have led to maximal bone induction, hereby masking possible synergistic or additive effects of the other growth factors, that are well established for VEGF (Kanczler et al, 2010;Kempen et al, 2009) and also reported for SDF-1α (Ratanavaraporn et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%