Osteotomy around the knee: state of the art and new challenges

Benzakour, Thami

doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0942-7

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

(21 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Knee preservation surgery has witnessed a rapid evolution of osteotomy techniques over the past two decades [ 4 , 9 , 21 , 36 , 48 , 56 ]. Medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) may be managed with a high tibial osteotomy (HTO) [ 30 , 31 ], distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) [ 17 , 39 ] or double‐level osteotomy (DLO) [ 4 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Superior accuracy in knee double level osteotomy using a novel hybrid fixation technique compared to conventional double plating

Mabrouk,

Monda,

Bell

et al. 2024

J. exp. orthop.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study aimed to compare two different double‐level knee osteotomy (DLO) fixation techniques. The primary outcome reported the radiological coronal plane correction and its accuracy. The secondary outcomes reported the correction outliers, the clinical outcomes, the 5‐year postoperative satisfaction and the complications.MethodsA retrospective review of a single surgeon osteotomy database identified 52 cases of DLO between 2011 and 2019, of which 24 cases met the inclusion criteria. Patients were categorised into two groups: the nail‐plate (NP) group fixed with a magnetic extendable intramedullary tibial nail and femoral conventional plate, and the double‐plate (DP) group fixed with conventional plates (tibia and femur). Radiographic parameters were recorded, including the mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and weight‐bearing line ratio (Mikulicz %). Surgical accuracy was calculated as the difference between the achieved and the planned correction. Outliers were defined as those with a greater than 10% difference from the planned correction. Simple knee value scores and visual analogue scale for pain were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 and 5 years. Five‐year patient satisfaction was recorded.ResultsA total of 24 patients were included: the NP group (n = 12) and the DP group (n = 12). Significant coronal plane corrections were achieved in the NP group for the mean mFTA (preoperative 167.9° ± 3.4° to postoperative 182.1° ± 1.4°), the mean MPTA (preoperative 83.5° ± 2.9° to postoperative 91.3° ± 2.8°) and the mean mLDFA (preoperative 89.8° ± 3.4° to postoperative 85.9° ± 4.4°). Similarly, significant coronal plane corrections were achieved in the DP group for the mean mFTA (preoperative 168.6° ± 4.4° to postoperative 182.2° ± 2°), the mean MPTA (preoperative 84.2° ± 2° to postoperative 88.3° ± 4.1°) and the mean mLDFA (preoperative 90.7° ± 2.9° to postoperative 83.9° ± 1.7°) (all p < 0.05). The mean correction accuracy was higher for the NP versus DP group at 3.4 ± 3.4% versus 7.1 ± 3.9% (intergroup p < 0.05). There were no outliers in the NP group versus two outliers (overcorrected) (16.7%) in the DP group. Significant clinical improvement was reported in both groups at 2 and 5 years postoperatively (all p < 0.05).ConclusionSuperior correction accuracy and no outliers were achieved in hybrid fixation double‐level knee osteotomy compared to the conventional double‐plating technique. The magnetic extendable nail offers the advantage of fine‐tuning the correction postoperatively and could be a potential research template for future designs of postoperative correction implants.Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective cohort study.

show abstract