2018
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes Following Three-Factor Inactive Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Versus Recombinant Activated Factor VII Administration During Cardiac Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, full text was assessed, leading to the exclusion of another 109 studies, resulting in 17 studies that were included in the analysis. Studies included two prospective studies 23,24 and 15 retrospective studies, 25‐39 yielding a total of 3060 patients (Figure 1). Characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Of these, full text was assessed, leading to the exclusion of another 109 studies, resulting in 17 studies that were included in the analysis. Studies included two prospective studies 23,24 and 15 retrospective studies, 25‐39 yielding a total of 3060 patients (Figure 1). Characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequent comparator to PCC was FFP with two studies investigating PCC only in comparison to FFP only 23,36 and nine studies investigating a combination of PCC and FFP in comparison to FFP only 24,26,28,31‐34,38,39 . Other comparators included rFVII, which was compared with PCC in four studies 27,29,35,37 . In one study that was conducted in Jehovah's Witness patients, the comparator consisted of not giving any coagulation factor or transfusion product, 30 and in one study the comparator was standard care that was not further specified 25 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given the limited data on direct comparisons of any of the factor concentrates, Harper and colleagues look to further expand our understanding of the efficacy and adverse outcomes associated with PCC and rFVIIa. 16 In this current issue of the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, they perform a retrospective analysis of 3-factor PCC (Bebulin, Baxalta US Inc, Westlake Village, CA) and rFVIIa (NovoSeven RT, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Review of medical records from January 2003 to April 2015 revealed 72 patients that received 3-factor PCC and 263 patients that received rFVIIa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%