2004
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.130.5.575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes for Cochlear Implant Users With Significant Residual Hearing

Abstract: Objectives: To develop an evidence-based technique for providing recommendations to candidates for cochlear implantation with significant residual hearing and to assess the efficacy of the approach. Design: Modified selection criteria were derived from an analysis of the postoperative performance for a large group of adult cochlear implant users. In particular, the distributions of results for implant users with significant preoperative open-set speech perception were reviewed. This suggested that the candidat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It showed that as early as three months post-operatively, the number of ceiling scores was at least 16.5 or 38.8% depending on the cut-off applied, and that these generally increased over time. Dowell et al (2004) reported CUNY scores of above 91% in almost 50% of participants. Our findings on a larger cohort of CI recipients some ten years later, show an even higher rate of recipients attaining ceiling scores with 82% of the subjects scoring above 90%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It showed that as early as three months post-operatively, the number of ceiling scores was at least 16.5 or 38.8% depending on the cut-off applied, and that these generally increased over time. Dowell et al (2004) reported CUNY scores of above 91% in almost 50% of participants. Our findings on a larger cohort of CI recipients some ten years later, show an even higher rate of recipients attaining ceiling scores with 82% of the subjects scoring above 90%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This, in turn, has resulted in improved speech perception skills of the recipients (Fabry et al, 2009, Gifford et al, 2008, Lenarz et al, 2012, Ruffin et al, 2007, Gifford et al, 2010. In clinical settings, speech perception outcomes are used to identify the potential candidates for CI surgery and also to evaluate the progress of the CI recipient post implantation (Gifford et al, 2008, Alkaf and Firszt, 2007, Gifford et al, 2010, Dowell et al, 2004, Blamey et al, 1992. Therefore, it is essential to utilise a suitable speech perception test for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations