Outcomes in AML patients receiving HMA + venetoclax combination with prior HMA exposure.

Abstract

e19011 Background: Venetoclax (Ven) is a BCL-2 inhibitor approved in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in newly diagnosed AML patients who are not candidates for intensive induction based on impressive response rates (CR+CRi of 66.4%) and median overall survival (14.7 months) compared to HMA therapy alone (DiNardo CD, NEJM, 2020). Ven was also used in combination with 10 days of a HMA (Decitabine) in a phase II study. In the subgroup of patients with relapsed AML, some of which previously received HMA, the ORR, CR+CRi, and median OS were 62%, 42%, and 7.8 months respectively. (DiNardo CD, Lancet, 2020). To our knowledge there are no studies specifically looking at patients with AML receiving HMA + Ven with previous exposure to a HMA agent. Methods: We conducted a single center retrospective study of AML patients who received HMA + Ven therapy after previously receiving a HMA agent. Baseline demographic, clinical, laboratory, pathology, and outcomes data were collected by retrospective chart review. Response criteria was determined by 2017 ELN recommendations. Kaplan Meier was constructed to summarize time to event data. Results: A total of 17 patients were identified that met these criteria. 7 patients (41%) had progressed on prior HMA treatment, 11 patients (65%) received prior intensive chemotherapy, and 5 patients (29%) received previous Allogenic SCT prior to HMA+Ven therapy. 10 patients (59%) had either a TP53 mutation or 17p deletion and 11 patients (65%) had complex cytogenetics (≥ 3 cytogenetic abnormalities). Other patient characteristics are included in table below. For the entire cohort, the ORR (CR, CRi, PR) was 41% and the CR/CRi rate was 6%; The ORR in the following subgroups for previous HMA failure, TP53 mutation/17p deletion, and complex cytogenetics were 14%, 30%, and 36% respectively. The median Progression free survival and overall survival for the entire cohort was 2 months (1-4 months 95% CI) and 3 months (1-5 months, 95% CI) respectively. 15 patients (88%) were deceased and all deaths were attributed to AML (12/15) or infection (3/15). None of the patients went on to receive an Allogenic SCT. Conclusions: Although a limited sample size which includes many patients with a TP53/17p aberration, complex cytogenetics, Allogenic SCT relapse, and/or heavily pre-treated AML, this data describes poor outcomes in patients receiving HMA+Ven after previous HMA exposure. Patients with previous HMA failure in particular had a poor response rate. None of the patients received 10 day decitabine and it is unclear if this had any effect on the results. It would be beneficial to supplement this data with experience from multiple centers. Patient Characteristics (N = 17).[Table: see text]

Proteomics for optimizing therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents versus conventional chemotherapy

“…Moreover, achieving long-term remission is still challenging in AML [ 14 ], and the VH combination has proven advantageous for use in patients with relapse [ 15 ]. However, it has been reported that specific groups of patients may not benefit from VH [ 16 ]. Moreover, despite the improved molecular classification of AML and the resulting improvement in prognostication for outcome, these schemas do not predict which of the available regimens individual patients will respond best to, especially older patients [ 17 , 18 ].…”