2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01226-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outgroup faces hamper word recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For visual word recognition, we used a lexical decision task exploiting the taboo connotation of the stimuli to trigger a semantic interference. Compared to neutral stimuli, taboo (i.e., socially inappropriate) words have been repeatedly shown to slow down responses in visual lexical decision (Carretié et al, 2008;Geer & Bellard, 1996;Madan et al, 2017;Sulpizio et al, 2019;Sulpizio & Navarrete, 2020). This detrimental influence has been mostly related to the attentional-capture phenomena triggered by the salience of the taboo connotation (e.g., MacKay et al, 2004), which would divert resources away from the main task.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For visual word recognition, we used a lexical decision task exploiting the taboo connotation of the stimuli to trigger a semantic interference. Compared to neutral stimuli, taboo (i.e., socially inappropriate) words have been repeatedly shown to slow down responses in visual lexical decision (Carretié et al, 2008;Geer & Bellard, 1996;Madan et al, 2017;Sulpizio et al, 2019;Sulpizio & Navarrete, 2020). This detrimental influence has been mostly related to the attentional-capture phenomena triggered by the salience of the taboo connotation (e.g., MacKay et al, 2004), which would divert resources away from the main task.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%