2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/2589735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outrigger and Belt‐Truss System Design for High‐Rise Buildings: A Comprehensive Review Part II—Guideline for Optimum Topology and Size Design

Abstract: This article is the second part of the series of the comprehensive review which is related to the outrigger and belt-truss system design for tall buildings. In this part, by presenting and analyzing as much relevant excellent resources as possible, a guideline for optimum topology and size design of the outrigger system is provided. This guideline will give an explanation and description for the used theories, assumptions, concepts, and methods in the reviewed articles for optimum topology and size design. Fin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
(495 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…width of the structure can obviously influence the optimum locations of outriggers, the drift-reduction efficiency and the reduction efficiency of the moment at the base of core. (2) The optimum locations of all the outriggers move downward as the core-wall width increases. (3) The driftreduction efficiency and moment-reduction efficiency of the outrigger-braced structure increase as the core-wall width increases.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…width of the structure can obviously influence the optimum locations of outriggers, the drift-reduction efficiency and the reduction efficiency of the moment at the base of core. (2) The optimum locations of all the outriggers move downward as the core-wall width increases. (3) The driftreduction efficiency and moment-reduction efficiency of the outrigger-braced structure increase as the core-wall width increases.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The outrigger‐braced structure is one of them. It is efficient and economical for resisting lateral load [1–3] . The use of outriggers in tall buildings is from the concept of deep beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also described the implementation of these devices in the tall structural system and further explained the new contemporary structural forms and their Fig. 6 Virtual outrigger system using belt trusses [25] concept, their advantages, and disadvantages, their material, topology and size, number of stories, and scale of real example buildings that are coated for all the classification of structures with the location, and specification is also presented by the article [26,27]. The shortcoming of the tall building led to structural control practice to safeguard the skyscrapers battered by uncertainty.…”
Section: Development Of Outrigger Structural System From Tall Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Framed-Tube Structure (2) meanwhile, is about making benefit of the whole building perimeter to resist wind loads, in which columns are closely spaced and are connected with deep spandrel beams. To enhance the performance of a Framed-Tube structure, belt trusses are often used to equalize the load distribution and to minimize the effects of shear lag often experienced in such structures [15]. A Tube-in-Tube Structure (3) is when a core is added usually of shear walls for better performance against gravity and lateral loads.…”
Section: Structural Guidelines and Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%