2010
DOI: 10.4148/2378-5977.2989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ovarian characteristics, serum hormoneconcentrations, and fertility in lactating dairy cows inresponse to equine chorionic gonadotropin (2010)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Study 4. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 124) in 1 herd (Pulley et al, 2013) were enrolled in a 7-d Ovsynch and alternately received eCG concurrent with PGF 2α . Cows were treated with GnRH-2 at 56 h after PGF 2α and inseminated 17 h later.…”
Section: Source Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study 4. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 124) in 1 herd (Pulley et al, 2013) were enrolled in a 7-d Ovsynch and alternately received eCG concurrent with PGF 2α . Cows were treated with GnRH-2 at 56 h after PGF 2α and inseminated 17 h later.…”
Section: Source Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise in dairy cattle, treatment of cows with an unknown CL status with 0, 1, or 2 progesterone inserts as part of an Ovsynch timed AI program did not alter subsequent P/AI, but cows with progesterone inserts had reduced premature luteolysis and fewer asynchronous post-AI estrous cycles than controls (Lima et al, 2009). Furthermore, when dairy cows were targeted in either a 5- (Bisinotto et al, 2013) or 7-d (Stevenson et al, 2008;Bisinotto et al, 2015a) Ovsynch timed AI program, P/AI was greater in non-CL cows treated with either 1 or 2 progesterone inserts compared with non-CL control cows, and P/AI of progesterone-treated non-CL cows was comparable with cows in diestrus Stevenson et al, 2008Stevenson et al, , 2012Stevenson and Phatak, 2010;Stevenson, 2011Stevenson, , 2016Pulley et al, 2013 cows on the basis of progesterone concentration categories at the onset of the ovulation synchronization program (7-d CO-Synch + CIDR timed AI program: beef = GnRH injection and CIDR insertion, 7 d later PGF 2α and insert removal, 48 to 72 h later GnRH and AI; dairy = GnRH injection, 7 d later PGF 2α , 48 to 56 h later GnRH and AI). An interaction of parity and progesterone category was detected (P = 0.011) such that P/AI in primiparous, but not in multiparous, beef cows was greater when progesterone concentrations >2 ng/mL.…”
Section: Prebreeding Progesterone Milieumentioning
confidence: 90%
“…(Figure 4A and 4B). (Stevenson et al, 2015) and for dairy cattle from 8 studies (Stevenson et al, 2008(Stevenson et al, , 2012Stevenson and Phatak, 2010;Stevenson, 2011Stevenson, , 2016Pulley et al, 2013. Prebreeding progesterone concentration at the time of PGF 2α injection had no effect on P/AI in beef cattle, whereas P/AI increased (P < 0.001) with increasing concentration of progesterone from <1.0 to 4.0 ng/mL in dairy cows.…”
Section: Progesterone Before Pgf and At Aimentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations