Over‐the‐counter bleaching agents can help with tooth whitening maintenance

Jorge, Olivia Santana; Torrieri, Rafaella Tonani; Vivanco, Rocío Geng; Pires‐de‐Souza, Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri

doi:10.1111/jerd.12617

Cited by 19 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, ΔE1 and ΔE2 mean values of Coconut Oil Swish (study group) recorded 1.24 and 2.23 respectively; which are not perceptible clinically as the difference is clinically perceptible only when ΔE values are over 3.46 units (30) . This result is consistent with a study of Karadas & Hatipoglu, 2015 (9) and Olivia, 2020 (31) , found that whiteness of teeth treated with different hydrogen peroxide and carbamide peroxide containing mouthwashes increased over time and that it was significantly higher than the whiteness of teeth that received no treatment. Moreover, Crest 3D White mouth-rinse recorded the highest recovery whitening efficacy between a group of whitening toothpastes and mouth-rinse products, this study was done on bleached teeth stained in coffee solution (32) .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Evaluation of Coconut Oil Pulling vs. Whitening Mouthwash as Home Teeth Whitening Methods

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: This study was aimed to evaluate whitening efficacy, tooth sensitivity, and soft tissue irritation of coconut oil pulling as a home whitening method compared to an over-the-counter whitening mouthwash. Material and Methods: A randomized controlled clinical study was done on 60 females at Umm Al-Qura University, Faculty of Dentistry. The participants were divided into two main groups (n=30), to test two whitening agents; Study Group "Coconut Oil Swish" and Control Group "Crest 3D White". Color measurement was done using the VITA Easyshade® Advance device at three times; the baseline, after one week and after two weeks of whitening. Pain assessment " tooth sensitivity & soft tissue irritation" was done by utilizing the Pain Rating Scale "Wong-Baker FACES". Results: The results in this study revealed no significant difference between lightness of the both group but the color differences (ΔE1 & ΔE2) in the Crest 3D White (control group) were scientifically higher than in the Coconut Oil Swish (study group). Regarding the pain assessment, a significant difference in pain scores was found between the two groups as Coconut Oil Swich (study group) recorded lower pain score than Crest 3D White (control group). Conclusion: Although the Coconut oil pulling revealed a whitening efficacy after two weeks of use; the whitening mouthwash that contains 1.5% hydrogen peroxide recorded higher color change at one-or two-weeks use. Coconut oil pulling causes less tooth sensitivity and/or soft tissue irritation during regular use when compared to the whitening mouthwash that contains 1.5% hydrogen peroxide.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Evaluation of Coconut Oil Pulling vs. Whitening Mouthwash as Home Teeth Whitening Methods

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The search of clearer teeth has been constant, as the beauty and harmony of the smile is often linked with the color of the teeth. 1 Thus, tooth whitening has become the most popular esthetic treatment in dentistry due to being a conservative approach [2][3][4] and the color of teeth has been one of the most determinant factors for patients' satisfaction and self-esteem. 5 Tooth whitening can be performed by different techniques (inoffice and/or at home) and regardless of the whitening technique used, hydrogen peroxide is the agent responsible for the whitening effect.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Whitening effect of 35% hydrogen peroxide in simulation of tooth with orthodontic bracket

Silvestre

Rêgo

Pires‐de‐Souza

et al. 2021

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To evaluate the color change and tooth whitening perception in 2 and 3 mm dental specimens simulating the orthodontic bracket for a 14‐day period. Materials and methods Forty bovine tooth fragments (8 × 7 mm) of 2 mm (G2, n = 20) and 3 mm (G3, n = 20) were divided into Control (C: without bracket simulation and whitening) and Experimental (E: with composite resin simulating orthodontic bracket cementation area). Analyses of color change (ΔE00) and perception of tooth whitening (WID) were performed before (T0) and after (T1) the first bleaching session; before (T2) and after (T3) the second bleaching session; and after 7 days of the second bleaching session (T4). Results After 14 days (T4), ΔE00 and WID showed similarity results, except for G2C and G3E. The thickness did not influence the ΔE00 and WID (G2C = G3C and G2E = G3E). The presence of orthodontic bracket did not interfere in the color change or tooth whitening perception after 14 days, except for comparison of G2C and G3E. Additionally, dentin thickness did not influence the color change. Clinical significance Teeth with orthodontic brackets showed similar color change and whitening perception to teeth without orthodontic bracket, but it is not influenced by dentin thickness.

show abstract

“…Mouth rinses are adjunct over-the-counter substances for mouth cleansing. Whitening mouth rinses supposedly present a tooth whitening effect, mainly produced by substances such as hydrogen peroxide 5,21 . Considering the acquisition of mouth rinses does not require a professional prescription, anybody can use them, including individuals with esthetic dental restorations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of whitening mouth rinses on the chemical and physical properties of a nanofilled composite

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This study analyzed the effect of whitening mouth rinses on water sorption (WS), solubility (SL), color change, and surface roughness of a nanofilled composite. Whitening perceptibility and acceptability (WID) were also studied. Methods: Forty specimens of Filtek Z350XT, shade EA2 were produced and randomly distributed (n=8) to AS – artificial saliva (control); LWE – Listerine Whitening Extreme; CLW – Colgate Luminous White; LCM – Listerine Cool Mint; and CP – Colgate Plax. They were immersed in the mouth rinses 2x/day, for one minute, during 28 days. The color was assessed using an Easyshade spectrophotometer (CIE-L*a*b* system). Surface roughness (Ra-μm) was measured with three parallel measures, using an RP-200 roughness meter. The WS and SL (μg/mm-3) were analyzed based on the ISO 4049 recommendations. The data were analyzed using one- and two-way ANOVA/Tukey tests (α=0.05). Results: Surface roughness significantly increased after immersion in AS and LCM, with no significant differences between the groups either before or after immersion. The ΔE* was not significantly different between the groups. All substances produced a ΔWID higher than the 50%:50% perceptibility and acceptability thresholds. The WS and SL were not significantly affected by the mouth rinses. Conclusion: Whitening mouth rinses did not affect WS, SL, surface roughness, and color stability of a nanofilled composite, regardless of the presence of ethanol in the composition.

show abstract

Over‐the‐counter bleaching agents can help with tooth whitening maintenance

Cited by 19 publications

References 28 publications

Evaluation of Coconut Oil Pulling vs. Whitening Mouthwash as Home Teeth Whitening Methods

Evaluation of Coconut Oil Pulling vs. Whitening Mouthwash as Home Teeth Whitening Methods

Whitening effect of 35% hydrogen peroxide in simulation of tooth with orthodontic bracket

Effect of whitening mouth rinses on the chemical and physical properties of a nanofilled composite

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About