Overselling Globalization: The Misleading Conflation of Economic Globalization and Immigration, and the Subsequent Backlash

Abstract

Many think that immigration is something caused by globalization, and some subsequently blame immigrants for the increased inequalities produced by economic globalization. Xenophobic nationalism has gained popularity around the world, further increasing racial tensions but without addressing the underlying causes of growing socioeconomic inequality, which this paper strives to show is caused by economic policies, not immigration. This paper argues that the apparent retreat from globalization arises from the flawed conceptualization of “globalization” as a bundle of different processes. This study analyzes early framings of economic globalization and shows how it has been linked, for political reasons, to increased migration, diversity, and open borders. Coining the term ”globalization” was not just naming ongoing social change, but it became part of the branding of an elite ideological policy project. The popular framing of globalization purposely entangled independent phenomena such as free trade policies, the expansion of the internet, cosmopolitan identities, and international migration. These couplings brought together neoliberal conservatives and liberal cosmopolitans. Given the current backlash, it is essential to distinguish migration from policies favoring trade and capital movement across borders. It is noteworthy to remember that immigration is something that preceded globalization. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate how migration became entangled with globalization in the popular imagination.

Globalisme en taal in die hoër onderwys: Redes vir die keuse van Engels as onderrigtaal

“…Dit hang saam met die verlies aan breinkrag en kundigheid in ontwikkelende lande tot voordeel van ontwikkelde state (die breinkwyn) merendeels tot nadeel van ander tale as Engels. Dit veroorsaak weer 'n negatiewe terugvoerlus wat onderrig in ander tale betref (Castañeda & Shemesh 2020).…”

“…Nasiestate en plaaslike kulture word gevolglik nie langer as belangrike kragte in die opkomende wêreldorde beskou nie. Die sosiale, politieke en ekonomiese domeine moet derhalwe verander om aan te pas by die nuwe ekonomiese orde wat deur globalisering en die ontwikkeling van IKT's teweeg gebring is.Kenners steun egter toenemend 'n meer genuanseerde siening van globalisering(Castañeda & Shemesh 2020;Martell 2007). Alhoewel hulle nie die realiteit van globaliserende kragte doi.10.17159/2224-7912/2021/v61n1a18…”

A Critical Study on the State of Globalization Today, Focusing on Selected Current Global Issues

“…Then, Theodore Levitt, the marketing professor from Harvard Business School, became one of the first scholars who defined it as the expansion of corporation around the globe. Economically, it is the concurrent sales and marketing of similar products and services all around the world (Castañeda and Shemesh, 2020). This was echoed by the World Health Organisation (WHO) that defined it as the acceleration of interdependence and inter-linked between people and countries by opening the international borders.…”

International Trade in the Covid-19 Outbreak: Is the Digital Economy Working?

“…The conditions of the international order competitive in nature, a driving factor for the state to maximize its achievements. Even so, the state tends to heed the benefits obtained in this cooperation but still tries to get absolute benefits (Castañeda & Shemesh, 2020;Tauss, 2012;Wills, 2014).…”