2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11382-1_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of RepLab 2014: Author Profiling and Reputation Dimensions for Online Reputation Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
60
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also some public tools with this purpose, such as SocialMention 6 . In addition, there have been several studies in calculate the reputation of an entity, this is, how an entity is being valued in the Internet (Villena-Román et al, 2012;Amigó et al, 2014). Our proposal contains different statistical visualisations, reputation calculation, and advanced filtering by different dimensions, everything in real-time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also some public tools with this purpose, such as SocialMention 6 . In addition, there have been several studies in calculate the reputation of an entity, this is, how an entity is being valued in the Internet (Villena-Román et al, 2012;Amigó et al, 2014). Our proposal contains different statistical visualisations, reputation calculation, and advanced filtering by different dimensions, everything in real-time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 These tasks were organized as a CLEF evaluation task [8,9] where teams were given a set of entities and for each entity a set of tweets were provided. In RepLab 2013 the challenge was to classify tweets as relevant or irrelevant with respect to the entity, and in RepLab 2014, the challenge was to classify tweets with respect to the reputation dimension of an entity.…”
Section: Thesis Flow and Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we present the aggregation of these measures into a single measure. Note that we use non-normalized versions of relatedness measures as the range of values for Wikipedia category-article based heuristics is not wide, and moreover, we wish to capture even subtle relationships between the concepts represented by the textual units 9 . In the formulations presented below we use the notation of 1) p to denote the candidate phrase for which a relatedness measure is to be calculated, and 2) cat t to denote the category taxonomy corresponding to the entity under consideration.…”
Section: Relatedness Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modern systems and SA's state of the art can be seen in NLP Workshops and competitive challenges, such as RepLab [7], SemEval Twitter SA [8], and aspect based SA tasks [9,10]. These events attract participants around the world, but most focused in the English language.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%