“…Surprisingly, with the exception of inhibitor 5 , the IC 50 values are comparable, even in the case of inhibitor 3 that lacks the H‐bonds between Thr134 and His157 and the P 1 Gln side chain, suggesting that the positioning of inhibitors 1 to 5 in the active site is sub‐optimal and that, in addition to ring size, other factors come into play, such as, for example, the nature and orientation of the heterocyclic (1,4‐triazole) and phenyl ring in the linker and “cap”, respectively, as well as conformational effects. Similar observations were made with some recently reported 1,3,4‐oxadiazole‐based macrocyclic inhibitors …”