2005
DOI: 10.1029/2005jd005992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ozone column retrieval from solar UV measurements at ground level: Effects of clouds and results from six European sites

Abstract: [1] A differential absorption method, developed by the Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique (LOA), is applied to retrieve the total ozone column from UV global irradiance spectra under clear and cloudy sky conditions. Contrarily to clear sky, cloudy sky generates a high uncertainty in the retrieved ozone column. This study shows that under cloudy conditions the daily ozone mean is a rather good estimation of the true value. The standard deviation allows us to estimate the relative uncertainty of this mean value… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this technique, it is possible to retrieve ozone under clear sky and cloudy conditions. A previous study (Brogniez et al, 2005) has shown that under cloudy conditions the daily ozone mean is a rather good estimation of the true value. The uncertainties on the ozone retrieval are about 3% on clear sky and on cloudy days, the performance depends on the cloudiness: for example for cloudiness lower than 4 octas, the averaged uncertainty is about 4%, when cloudiness is larger than 4 octas, the averaged uncertainty is about 7%.…”
Section: Ozone Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this technique, it is possible to retrieve ozone under clear sky and cloudy conditions. A previous study (Brogniez et al, 2005) has shown that under cloudy conditions the daily ozone mean is a rather good estimation of the true value. The uncertainties on the ozone retrieval are about 3% on clear sky and on cloudy days, the performance depends on the cloudiness: for example for cloudiness lower than 4 octas, the averaged uncertainty is about 4%, when cloudiness is larger than 4 octas, the averaged uncertainty is about 7%.…”
Section: Ozone Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satellite ozone and UV data derived from TOMS were exhaustively validated by means of ground-based ozone and UV data (Brogniez et al, 2005;Fioletov et al, 2002;Arola et al, 2005;Kazantzidis et al, 2006). Brogniez et al (2005) found a reasonably good agreement between satellite ozone data and ground-based measurements retrieved in six European sites: generally the ground-based ozone seems to be slightly higher than TOMS ozone (less than 3%). Regarding UV data, Fioletov et al (2002) found that erythemal UV estimates from TOMS demonstrate better agreement with ground-based measurements in case of low level of pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OMI UV algorithm is based on the Total Ozone Monitoring System (TOMS) heritage (Krotkov et al, 1998Tanskanen et al, 2006). TOMS and OMI UV data validation results were presented in several papers, analysing in details their strengths and weaknesses (Brogniez et al, 2005;Fioletov et al, 2002;Arola et al, 2005;Kazantzidis et al, 2009;Arola et al, 2009;Ialongo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%