2014
DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-0159.2014.tb00432.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P‐171: Physical Touch Aspects of the Touch Interface for Flight Deck Applications

Abstract: This paper describes friction properties between a touchscreen display and the human finger. The friction measurements were made on a custom device that incorporates a 3-dimensional force plate. Friction properties are found to be dependent on surface structure, surface materials, the finger's hydration level, and the speed of the finger across the surface.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no studies detail this relationship between neuromuscular settings and touchscreen tasks, the differences between the multisine (continuous dragging, Section 3.2.1) and step task (discrete dragging, Section 3.2.2) are expected to directly affect the cancellation. Moreover, as the screen input velocity goes toward zero, as in the step task, there is a possibility of nonlinear stick-slip, which can further degrade the applicability of the BDFT models (Robinson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no studies detail this relationship between neuromuscular settings and touchscreen tasks, the differences between the multisine (continuous dragging, Section 3.2.1) and step task (discrete dragging, Section 3.2.2) are expected to directly affect the cancellation. Moreover, as the screen input velocity goes toward zero, as in the step task, there is a possibility of nonlinear stick-slip, which can further degrade the applicability of the BDFT models (Robinson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%