1967
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(67)90312-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(p, n) and (p, 2n) cross sections of nine elements between 7.0 and 15.0 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second possible explanation for the discrepancy is purely experimental. The work of Chodil [17] on the SlV(p,2n) reaction suggests the likelihood of a very sharply defined peak. The present experiment performed in the internal circulating beam of the McGill Synchrocyclotron may not sample a narrow enough proton energy range to clearly define a peak at 20MeV.…”
Section: A 481i Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A second possible explanation for the discrepancy is purely experimental. The work of Chodil [17] on the SlV(p,2n) reaction suggests the likelihood of a very sharply defined peak. The present experiment performed in the internal circulating beam of the McGill Synchrocyclotron may not sample a narrow enough proton energy range to clearly define a peak at 20MeV.…”
Section: A 481i Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1 are also compared with equivalent TENDL-2015 and TENDL-2017 calculations. Ten datasets were rejected (Tanaka and Furukawa [22] (values too low), Albouy et al [24] (values too high), Hontzeas and Yaffe [28] (energy shift), Chodil et al [33] (values too high), Mehta et al (a) [36] (energy shift above 10 MeV), Stück [40] (data in energy range not included in fit), Kailas et al (b) [41] (energy shift), Michel et al [42] (data in energy range not included in fit), Bastos et al [43] (values too high), and Musthafa et al [47] (values too low)), and the remaining twenty-two sets were used in the statistical fitting procedure. These selected data and their experimental uncertainties are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Parentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hg behavior was assessed by gamma spectroscopy of the 197m Hg (Eγ=133.99 keV, t1/2=23.8 h) isotope [208]. Due to the scattered neutrons (produced in the (p,n) reaction) at the target chamber, 198 Au (Eγ=411.80 keV, t1/2=2.70 d) was also produced via the 197 Au(n,γ) 198 Au reaction which yielded a convenient tracer for quantifying the Au content in the elution fractions [208]. Figure 45 shows the gamma spectra of the irradiated Au foil and the As can be seen in Figure 46, both Au and Hg have strong uptake at the load condition of 1 M HNO3, but Hg extraction is negligible above 10 M HNO3 while Au is still strongly sorbed up to ~13 M HNO3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical tracers produced for this work utilized proton-bombardment reactions on stable target materials; however, heavier charged particles such as helium can also be used. The In(p,n) 113 Sn reactions have been reported in literature, separation methods of carrier-free activity from the Sn, Au, and In target materials are lacking [197][198][199].…”
Section: Chapter 5: Production Of Carrier-free Radionuclidesmentioning
confidence: 99%