2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P01. Can one-step nucleic acid amplification assay predict 4 or more positive axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients: A single centre retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, for the subsequent multiple regression analysis (with each DEG as dependent variable and the respective signi cant clinicopathologic parameters as independent variables), as TTL and OSNA sample result were almost coincident (r s = 0.997; p < 0.001) (Additional le 2) and TTL have a greater and proven clinical relevance, only TTL was considered. (13,15,19) For KRT7, VTCN1, CD44, GATA3, ALOX15B and RORC, a multiple linear regression with normalized expression levels of each DEG as dependent variable and signi cant clinicopathologic parameters (Table 8) as independent variables was attempted, but none of the independent variables were statistically signi cant. However, multiple linear regression with normalized expression levels of NECTIN2, LRG1, CD276, FOXM1 and IGF1R as dependent variables and the corresponding signi cant clinicopathologic parameters (Table 8) as independent variables revealed: an independent linear relationship between TTL and normalized expression levels of NECTIN2 (b = 0.002; p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.791); an independent linear relationship between TTL and normalized expression levels of LRG1 (b = 0.002; p = 0.004; R 2 = 0.578); an independent linear relationship between TTL and normalized expression levels of CD276 (b = 0.001; p = 0.003; R 2 = 0.652); an independent linear relationship between TTL and normalized expression levels of FOXM1 (b = 0.001; p = 0.003; R 2 = 0.822); and an independent linear relationship between TTL and normalized expression levels of IGF1R (b = 0.012; p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.830).…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Between Degs and Relevant Clinicopathol...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lastly, for the subsequent multiple regression analysis (with each DEG as dependent variable and the respective signi cant clinicopathologic parameters as independent variables), as TTL and OSNA sample result were almost coincident (r s = 0.997; p < 0.001) (Additional le 2) and TTL have a greater and proven clinical relevance, only TTL was considered. (13,15,19) For KRT7, VTCN1, CD44, GATA3, ALOX15B and RORC, a multiple linear regression with normalized expression levels of each DEG as dependent variable and signi cant clinicopathologic parameters (Table 8) as independent variables was attempted, but none of the independent variables were statistically signi cant. However, multiple linear regression with normalized expression levels of NECTIN2, LRG1, CD276, FOXM1 and IGF1R as dependent variables and the corresponding signi cant clinicopathologic parameters (Table 8) as independent variables revealed: an independent linear relationship between TTL and normalized expression levels of NECTIN2 (b = 0.002; p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.791); an independent linear relationship between TTL and normalized expression levels of LRG1 (b = 0.002; p = 0.004; R 2 = 0.578); an independent linear relationship between TTL and normalized expression levels of CD276 (b = 0.001; p = 0.003; R 2 = 0.652); an independent linear relationship between TTL and normalized expression levels of FOXM1 (b = 0.001; p = 0.003; R 2 = 0.822); and an independent linear relationship between TTL and normalized expression levels of IGF1R (b = 0.012; p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.830).…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Between Degs and Relevant Clinicopathol...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15,18) Previous studies revealed that TTL is an independent predictor of the status of the non-sentinel LNs in BC patients and to be independently correlated with disease free survival, local recurrence free survival and overall survival. (13,15,(18)(19)(20) Nevertheless, the exact TTL cut-off to determine ALND is still under debate. (13,18,19,21,22) Although LNs metastases is among the strongest predictors of prognosis, few studies have focused on the assessment of immunoin ammatory response in the LNs and the mechanisms that underlie the local failure of effective anti-tumor immune responses remain poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Total tumor load (TTL) was defined as the sum of the total number of CK19 mRNA copies in all positive SLNs (in copies/μL) [ 15 , 18 ]. Previous studies revealed that TTL is an independent predictor of the status of the non-sentinel LNs in BC patients and to be independently correlated with disease free survival, local recurrence free survival and overall survival [ 13 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Nevertheless, the exact TTL cut-off to determine ALND is still under debate [ 13 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies revealed that TTL is an independent predictor of the status of the non-sentinel LNs in BC patients and to be independently correlated with disease free survival, local recurrence free survival and overall survival [ 13 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Nevertheless, the exact TTL cut-off to determine ALND is still under debate [ 13 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 ]. Moreover, despite all the benefits of the OSNA, one downside of the OSNA assay is the destruction of the SLNs, preventing further microstructural studies that could provide useful information on immune response and tumor aggressiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%