2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.07.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P044 C1q status and titer of de novo donor specific antibodies are not predictors of allograft survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
33
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In parallel, at bead level, we also observed that MFI from untreated serum was a poor predictor of complement interference occurrence in comparison with the treated condition. Interestingly, the optimal EDTA MFI thresholds for predicting complement interference described here are similar to those we recently reported for T‐lymphocyte complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch results prediction, but also to those we and others described for C1q‐ and C3d‐binding ability . These concordant findings emphasize the tight link that associates the ability of HLA antibodies to strongly activate the complement and the interference phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In parallel, at bead level, we also observed that MFI from untreated serum was a poor predictor of complement interference occurrence in comparison with the treated condition. Interestingly, the optimal EDTA MFI thresholds for predicting complement interference described here are similar to those we recently reported for T‐lymphocyte complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch results prediction, but also to those we and others described for C1q‐ and C3d‐binding ability . These concordant findings emphasize the tight link that associates the ability of HLA antibodies to strongly activate the complement and the interference phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“… Recipients with post‐transplant DSA: recipients showing post‐transplant DSA, either de novo DSA or pre‐transplant DSA that were maintained after transplant. The definition of de novo DSA was any DSA identified at least a week after transplant that was absent at any time prior to transplant (each recipient had at least one pre‐transplant SAB test) Recipients with no post‐transplant DSA: recipients who did not show DSA pre‐transplant or in any of the post‐transplant studies. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major determinant of C1q or C3d binding on SAB is the amount of DSA, which can be approximated by the MFI value . It is not surprising that most studies found a very strong correlation of the MFI value and C1q or C3d binding . While some studies including a recent meta‐analysis found that C1q or C3d binding assays add some prediction beyond the MFI value, other studies did not .…”
Section: Modifications Of the Generic Sab Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%