P12.05 Evaluating the compatibility of tumor treating electric fields with key antitumoral immune functions

Abstract

BACKGROUND TTFields has the ability to induce immunogenic cell death (ICD). As immunotherapy and TTFields have different mechanisms of action (MOA), combining these therapies is a rational approach. Contrarily, TTFields may interfere with immune functions critical for effective T cell function. MATERIAL AND METHODS We cultured T cells from healthy donors’ peripheral blood or from viably dissociated glioblastoma samples under normal or TTFields conditions, with or without superantigen-stimulation. In order to assess T cell responses we used eight-color flow cytometry by monitoring select pivotal antitumoral functions: proliferation (CFSE), IFNγ secretion, cytotoxic degranulation (CD107a), activation/exhaustion (PD1) and viability. Evaluation of direct cytotoxicity was done by using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. RESULTS TTFields did not change T cell activation rates for all evaluated functions with the exception of reduced proliferation - in line with TTFields’ MOA. TTFields substantially reduced the viability of activated proliferating T cells, moderately affected activated nonproliferating T cells and had almost no effect on the viability of non-activated cells. Polyfunctionality analysis of T-cells, associated with effective antitumoral responses, demonstrated that under TTFields, the activated non-proliferating T cells retained polyfunctional capabilities. PD1-expressing TILs, a subset containing most of the tumor antigen-specific TILs, exhibited unaltered viability and functionality under TTFields. CAR T-cells, which utilize the same killing machinery as unmodified T cells, exhibited unaltered cytotoxic capability under TTFields. Immunohistochemical evaluation of GBM samples before TTFields treatment and after recurrence showed that some patients had accommodated large increases in their CD8 and CD4 counts. RNA-Seq performed on GBM samples from 6 standardly-treated and 6 TTFields-treated patients before treatment and after recurrence. The data shows differential increases in TTFields-treated patients to controls, in the expression of immune genes associated with favorable prognosis (e.g. t-bet, NKG2D, ICOS-L, CD70) and concurrent decreases in genes associated with poor prognosis (e.g. IL4, TSLP, various complement genes). CONCLUSION The preclinical data showed that all antitumoral T cell functions examined, but proliferation, were unhindered by TTFields. The clinical data showed that TTFields may shift treated tumors to a state more conducive of antitumoral immune responses. Our findings support the further preclinical and clinical investigation into combining TTFields with immunotherapy.

Tumor Treating Fields for Glioblastoma Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Diamant et al reported no impact on T-cell counts secondary to TTFields (20). In vitro studies of T-cell functionality such as induced cytotoxic degranulation and direct cytotoxic activity were not inhibited by TTFields (20). Taken together, the preclinical data, to date, suggests that TTFields do not induce local and systemic immunosuppressive effects and supports a favorable clinical safety profile for TTFields.…”

“…Hematopoiesis has been demonstrated to be unaffected by TTFields as hematopoietic stems cells, residing in the bone marrow, are shielded due to the high bone impedance resulting in significantly lower field intensities (19). Diamant et al reported no impact on T-cell counts secondary to TTFields (20). In vitro studies of T-cell functionality such as induced cytotoxic degranulation and direct cytotoxic activity were not inhibited by TTFields (20).…”