2007
DOI: 10.1109/dexa.2007.4313007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P2P over Manet: a comparison of cross-layer approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed model is then applied to study the energy efficiency of the proposed adaptive file sharing scheme over multiple hops between the source and destination devices. Peer-to-peer file sharing over multihop wireless networks has several potential applications in the area of ad hoc networks, e.g., Oliveira et al (2003), Ding and Bhargava (2004), Tang et al (2005) and Bisignano et al (2007). The empirical energy consumption model is composed of two components: energy consumption during data transmission and energy consumption during data compression.…”
Section: Empirical Energy Consumption Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed model is then applied to study the energy efficiency of the proposed adaptive file sharing scheme over multiple hops between the source and destination devices. Peer-to-peer file sharing over multihop wireless networks has several potential applications in the area of ad hoc networks, e.g., Oliveira et al (2003), Ding and Bhargava (2004), Tang et al (2005) and Bisignano et al (2007). The empirical energy consumption model is composed of two components: energy consumption during data transmission and energy consumption during data compression.…”
Section: Empirical Energy Consumption Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bandwidth and packet delay can also affect the decision at the routing layer to select a link. In [1] the authors compare the performance of LEMO (LEss remaining hop More Opportunity) algorithm by using DSR and AODV protocols at the routing layer and varying the mobility and the load conditions. With the help of performance metrics like packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay and normalized routing load, it is shown that cross-layering between DSR and IEEE 802.11 DCF performs better than cross-layering between AODV and IEEE 802.11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the adoption of current p2p techniques necessitates the existence of a fixed network topology [M. Bisignano et al, 2007] [M. Caleffi et al, 2009. With the term "fixed", we refer to wired and wireless networks that have formulated their physical topology and do not present any topology changes.…”
Section: Motivation -Main Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%