2008
DOI: 10.1080/02699050802403581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P300 analysis techniques in cognitive impairment after brain injury: Comparison with neuropsychological and imaging data

Abstract: Source analysis of P300 resulted in improved detection of neuropsychological abnormality in patients with brain injury. It is advisable to analyse P300 results in conjunction with imaging results. This approach may further facilitate the interpretation and diagnostic applicability of source analysis P300 results in patients with brain injury.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the findings are not consistent, and a number of variables have been shown to influence amplitude and latency deviations in TBI survivors (Campbell et al, 1990;Campbell and de Lugt, 1995;Deacon and Campbell, 1991;Deacon-Elliott and Campbell, 1987;Duncan et al, 2005;Elting et al, 2008). In Section 4.4, we review injury-related factors that have been shown to affect ERPs in TBI survivors.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the findings are not consistent, and a number of variables have been shown to influence amplitude and latency deviations in TBI survivors (Campbell et al, 1990;Campbell and de Lugt, 1995;Deacon and Campbell, 1991;Deacon-Elliott and Campbell, 1987;Duncan et al, 2005;Elting et al, 2008). In Section 4.4, we review injury-related factors that have been shown to affect ERPs in TBI survivors.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…(Duncan et al, 1994(Duncan et al, , 2003(Duncan et al, , 2009Johnson, 1989aJohnson, , 1989bPolich, 2007). The majority of ERP studies of TBI have used auditory tasks (Elting et al, 2005(Elting et al, , 2008Lew et al, 2007a;Naito et al, 2005;Reza et al, 2006Reza et al, , 2007Rousseff et al, 2006;Sarno et al, 2006;Segalowitz et al, 1997Segalowitz et al, , 2001Solbakk et al, 1999Solbakk et al, , 2002. Others have used visual tasks (Broglio et al, 2009;LaChapelle et al, 2008;Lew et al, 2005b;Roche et al, 2004), and a few have used tasks in both modalities (Bernstein, 2002;Doi et al, 2007;Duncan et al, 2003Duncan et al, , 2005Lew et al, 2004Lew et al, , 2007cLew et al, , 2009.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Luiz CBL, Silva MR, Godoy CCF, Gil D encontraram alteração no PEATE e no PEALL 11,14,[15][16][17][18][19] . Existe uma variabilidade de achados no PEATE e PEALL realizados em indivíduos que sofreram traumatismo cranioencefálico -TCE.…”
Section: Figura 3: Potencial Evocado Auditivo De Longa Latência Da Orunclassified
“…The P3a to novel distracter stimuli is generated by contribution of brain structures, including the hippocampus (Knight, 1996) and medial and inferior frontal (Baudena, Halgen, Heit, & Clarke, 1995;Elting et al, 2008), dorsal PFC and anterior cingulate cortex (Dien, Spencer, & Donchin, 2003). In a three-stimulus oddball task the P3a is interpreted as "orienting" to novel distracters, and the P3b as an index of ability to sustain attention to target.…”
Section: Stimulus-locked Erpmentioning
confidence: 99%