Pain and functional outcome after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. A comparative study

Santiago, Fernando Ruíz; Abela, A Pérez; Álvarez, Luis; Osuna, R M Álvarez; García, María del Mar Castellano

doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.010

Cited by 58 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A total of 242 titles and abstracts were preliminarily reviewed, of which 12 studies [11,15,17,22,28,29,33,36,39,41,48,49] eventually satisfied the eligibility criteria ( Fig. 1).…”

Section: Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1). These studies included one randomized controlled trial [28], three clinical controlled trials [15,36,41], five prospective cohort studies [11,22,29,33,39], three retrospective cohort studies [17,48,49] and no retrospective case series study. In total, 1081 patients and 1332 vertebral bodies were included in the 12 studies.…”

Section: Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the 12 included studies, only 1 RCT [28] had a low risk of bias, and the remaining 11 non-RCT [11,15,17,22,29,33,36,39,41,48,49] studies had a high risk of bias resulting from study design limitations. Only one trial [28] reported an adequately generated allocation sequence, and two trials [28,36] reported allocation concealment.…”

Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only one trial [28] reported an adequately generated allocation sequence, and two trials [28,36] reported allocation concealment. Three studies [28,36,39] reported using single-blinded outcome assessors, and no studies reported using double-blinded assessors; the other studies did not specify a blinding method. The methodological quality of the RCTs is presented in Fig.…”

Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One RCT [28] recruited only patients who presented with thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) OVCF. Santiago et al [39]. recruited only patients without known causes of osteoporosis (e.g., corticosteroid therapy, inflammatory spondyloarthropathy and diabetes mellitus).…”

Section: Demographic Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: grading the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xing

et al. 2012

Eur Spine J

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of balloon kyphoplasty (KP) compared with percutaneous vertebroplasty (VP) and provide recommendations for using these procedures to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). Methods A systematic search of all studies published through March 2012 was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID, ScienceDirect and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials that compared KP to VP and provided data on safety and clinical effects were identified. Demographic characteristics, adverse events and clinical outcomes were manually extracted from all of the selected studies. The evidence quality levels and recommendations were assessed using the GRADE system. Results Twelve studies encompassing 1,081 patients met the inclusion criteria. Subgroup meta-analyses were performed according to the study design. In the RCT subgroup, there were significant differences between the two procedures in short-term visual analog scale (VAS), long-term kyphosis angles, operative times and anterior vertebrae heights. In the cohort study subgroup, there were significant differences between the two procedures in short-and longterm VAS, short-and long-term Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), cement leakage rates, short-and long-term kyphosis angles, operative times and anterior vertebrae heights. However, there were no significant differences in long-term VAS or adjacent vertebral fracture rates in the RCT subgroup. There were no significant differences in short-or long-term VAS, short-or long-term ODI, cement leakage rates, adjacent vertebral fracture rates, short-or long-term kyphosis angles or anterior vertebrae heights in the CCT subgroup, and the adjacent vertebral fracture rates did not differ significantly in the cohort study subgroup. The overall GRADE system evidence quality was very low, which lowers our confidence in their recommendations. Conclusions KP and VP are both safe and effective surgical procedures for treating OVCF. KP may be superior to VP in patients with large kyphosis angles, vertebral fissures, fractures in the posterior edge of the vertebral body or significant height loss in the fractured vertebrae. Due to the poor quality of the evidence currently available, highquality RCTs are required.

show abstract

“…A total of 242 titles and abstracts were preliminarily reviewed, of which 12 studies [11,15,17,22,28,29,33,36,39,41,48,49] eventually satisfied the eligibility criteria ( Fig. 1).…”

Section: Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Demographic Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: grading the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xing

et al. 2012

Eur Spine J

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Complications of Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty for Thoracic and Lumbar Procedures

Beall¹,

Brasuell²,

Favre³

et al. 2022

Complications of Pain‐Relieving Procedures

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison of the Efficacy Between Two Micro‐Operative Therapies of Old Patients With Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Network Meta‐Analysis

Zhang

Shi

Tang

et al. 2017

J of Cellular Biochemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) afflicts most aged people. Except for conservative therapy (CT), percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) are another two the common choices, but current evaluation of their efficacy is not performed. All the trial data were originated from electronic database including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Four indicators with mean difference (MD) or odd ratio (OR) with their 95% credible interval (95% CrI) were analyzed to evaluate the efficacy, including the value of visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), relieving kyphotic angle (KA), and rate of fracture. Besides, the results were demonstrated in the forest plots and slash tables. Furthermore, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated. A total of 32 trials among 2,852 patients are included. Using network comparison, we found that PKP and PVP both have good performance as OVCF treatments. However, in different aspects, PKP seemed to be the best to eliminate pain with high value of SUCRA on ODI and VAS (0.624 and 0.588, respectively), and PVP had better performance in KA and decreasing incidence of fracture. The micro-operative therapy, both PKP and PVP, had better efficacy than CT in four aspects. And PKP was better in pain alleviating, according to VAS and ODI results, while PVP had the superiority in KA and reducing the incidence of fracture. J. Cell. Biochem. 118: 3205-3212, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

show abstract

Pain and functional outcome after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. A comparative study

Cited by 58 publications

References 18 publications

Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: grading the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis

Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: grading the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis

Complications of Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty for Thoracic and Lumbar Procedures

Comparison of the Efficacy Between Two Micro‐Operative Therapies of Old Patients With Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Network Meta‐Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About