2020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Panel-guided personalized medicine in metastatic breast and gynecological cancer: First experiences at the CCC Munich and clinically relevant changes over time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our clinical center, we managed to evaluate this trend over the past two and half years. Comparing the results of the presented study with those of our first study where we presented results of the first 100 patients with mBC or gynecologic malignancies, we have observed an improvement in the therapy implementation rates (16% in the presented study vs. 12.5% in the previous study), in the number of recommendations given (49% vs. 42%), and in the number of mutations found (53% vs. 48%) [ 59 ]. In addition, the number of technical problems occurring in the molecular diagnostics was significantly lower in the presented trial as compared to our earlier experiences (11% vs. 17% in our last presented study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In our clinical center, we managed to evaluate this trend over the past two and half years. Comparing the results of the presented study with those of our first study where we presented results of the first 100 patients with mBC or gynecologic malignancies, we have observed an improvement in the therapy implementation rates (16% in the presented study vs. 12.5% in the previous study), in the number of recommendations given (49% vs. 42%), and in the number of mutations found (53% vs. 48%) [ 59 ]. In addition, the number of technical problems occurring in the molecular diagnostics was significantly lower in the presented trial as compared to our earlier experiences (11% vs. 17% in our last presented study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%