2020
DOI: 10.14361/dcs-2020-0210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradata in Documentation Standards and Recommendations for Digital Archaeological Visualisations

Abstract: Digitalisation of research data and massive efforts to make it findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable has revealed that in addition to an eventual lack of description of the data itself (metadata), data reuse is often obstructed by the lack of information about the datamaking and interpretation (i.e. paradata). In search of the extent and composition of categories for describing processes, this article reviews a selection of standards and recommendations frequently referred to as useful for document… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 2020). This, in turn, has a negative impact on scientific transparency, interoperability and, ultimately, sustainability of HDCs (Börjesson et al. , 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 2020). This, in turn, has a negative impact on scientific transparency, interoperability and, ultimately, sustainability of HDCs (Börjesson et al. , 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…play a role in reinforcing the reflective approach that is central to research" (Barats et al, 2020). A comparable interest in ICPs can also be found in a variety of other disciplines, most importantly literary studies with the concept of paratext (Genette and MacLean, 1991;Genette, 1997;Ronald et al, 1992;Collins and Skover, 2010;Ciotti and Lin, 2016;Skare, 2021) and information science with the concept of paradata (B€ orjesson et al, 2020;Huvila, 2022). Both concepts have been adopted in the upcycling workflow that will be described in more detail below.…”
Section: The Pursuit Of Scientific Value Gainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How we effectively archive data for reuse depends on the nature of the data product. The preservation of different file formats has been extensively covered within the field of digital preservation, as has the role of metadata (Börjesson et al 2020; Clarke 2015; Kansa et al 2019; McManamon et al 2017; Niven and McManamon 2011; Richards et al 2022; Snow et al 2006). We encourage readers to consider which of the following archaeological information and data they create or transact with that should adhere to the FAIR principles.…”
Section: Why Fair Practices Are Important In Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the traditional role of metadata is to support resource discovery, more recent community-and discipline-specific standards for data description often aim to facilitate (re)use beyond mere retrieval. Such schemes incorporate descriptors requested in many of the previously discussed studies (e.g., Faniel, Frank, and Yakel 2019;Sobotkova 2018) on, for instance, provenance, collection methods, and quality assessment categories (Börjesson, Sköld, and Huvila 2021). For example, geographic information standards from the earlier-used Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (CSDGM) (n.d.) to the current ISO 19115-1:2014ISO 19115-1: (2014 contain categories explicitly intended to facilitate reuse.…”
Section: Metadata and Paradata Generation By Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, knowing about sieving methods and equipment used in the field can be critical in deciding how to combine and compare fishbone datasets to understand aquatic environments (Olson and Walther 2007), but is likely insignificant for a researcher with an interest in, for example, settlement patterns. Since fixed metadata standards build on explicit and implicit assumptions about what things and processes the scheme should describe and for what purpose, a set standard inevitably has its limitations (Börjesson, Sköld, and Huvila 2021). Therefore, the need to find ways to generate intentionally purposed meta-and paradata based on topical user needs grows along with the ambition to make use of legacy data and use data across disciplinary boundaries.…”
Section: Metadata and Paradata Generation By Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%