Paradox versus paradigm: A disconnect between understanding and management of freshwater cyanobacterial harmful algae blooms

Abstract

Freshwater cyanobacterial harmful algae blooms (cHABs) are a major threat to human and environmental health and are increasing globally in frequency and severity. To manage this threat in a timely manner, science must focus on increasing our ability to predict the growth and toxigenicity of specific taxa of cyanobacteria. Recent molecular research has revealed striking genomic and metabolic diversity among the many morphologically indistinguishable sub‐species and strains of cyanobacteria. Assemblage‐level molecular metabolic capability surveys promise to improve our ability to predict cyanobacterial responses to environmental forcing, but many of these cutting‐edge techniques are not widely available or cost‐effective enough to be employed in routine monitoring programmes to support management decisions. Taxonomic ambiguity, cryptic functional specialisation, incongruence between genomic capability and phylogeny, and genomic flexibility impose severe challenges to our ability to ascribe autecological attributes at a level of taxonomic resolution that is attainable under current management strategies (i.e. Linnaean species). This lack of knowledge prohibits reliable predictions of species' responses to environmental stressors. Cyanobacterial species comprise consortia of metabolically diverse, morphologically indistinct strains that span a range of ecological specialisation. Under current, broadly applied taxonomic concepts, these species functionally embody a generalist ecological strategy—persisting and/or proliferating where other specialised competitors are negatively impacted. We postulate that within current management frameworks, characterising of cyanobacterial species as competing generalists, as well as considering abundance trajectories of well‐characterised, non‐cyanobacterial specialist phytoplankton will generate more scalable, mechanistic, and management‐relevant insight into increasing cHAB frequency and severity in suitable time frames. Here we recommend that cHAB management considers the competitive framework of phytoplankton communities, including cyanobacteria, wherein diverse environmental changes lead to deterministic responses by readily identifiable, documented specialist taxa. Characterising these changes in community structure will quantify the relative importance of altered stressors and resource availability that can be exploited by metabolically flexible cyanobacteria.

A tale of two blooms: do ecological paradigms for algal bloom success and succession require revisiting?

“…Certainly, no one factor, or paradigm, is responsible for algal bloom success or succession at all times or in all places, and there exists ample evidence of the cross-effects and casual network of these paradigms in the literature. However, when paradigms are misinterpreted or incorrectly applied to biological phenomena, disconnects can occur between bloom events and bloom management ( Bramburger et al, 2023a ). For the limnologist, a return to many ecological principles ( e.g., competitive exclusion theory ( Hardin, 1960 )) is ripe for examination in the context of freshwaters.…”

Understanding the Risks of Diffusion of Cyanobacteria Toxins in Rivers, Lakes, and Potable Water

“…Anabaena has undergone extensive research due to its ability to produce diazotrophic endospores that can be used to study other cyanobacterial species further. It is commonly used in aquatic systems to increase their nutritional content because of its ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen [ 25 , 26 ]. By doing so, it can supply other species with fixed nitrogen in settings where it is scarce or absent.…”

From water quality to river health

“…The way that we think about algal blooms profoundly impacts our understanding of pathways toward renewed aquatic health (Bramburger et al, 2022). As ecological phenomena, cyanobacterial blooms shape and are shaped by pelagic zooplankton (Ger et al, 2016).…”