“…All the case reports and series met the minimum quality assessment standard and were included in the meta-analysis ( Supplementary Table S1 ) [ 2 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. Selection bias cannot be excluded as most authors did not explicitly explain their selection method; therefore, there is a possibility that some cases of cSCC arising from HS wounds were not reported, underestimating the total number of cases currently in the literature.…”