2005
DOI: 10.3141/1940-01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Part 1: Pavement Management: Analysis of Long-Term Effectiveness of Thin Hot-Mix Asphaltic Concrete Overlay Treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where x = log (1 + SV) and SV = 2.2704 IRI2. Labi, Lamptey, Konduri, and Sinha (2005) Based on the aforementioned arguments and to be consistent with other studies and the experience of road authorities, this study adopts the IRI as the key indicator of road performance.…”
Section: Road Pavement Deterioration and Performance Criteriamentioning
confidence: 81%
“…where x = log (1 + SV) and SV = 2.2704 IRI2. Labi, Lamptey, Konduri, and Sinha (2005) Based on the aforementioned arguments and to be consistent with other studies and the experience of road authorities, this study adopts the IRI as the key indicator of road performance.…”
Section: Road Pavement Deterioration and Performance Criteriamentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Each distress type within the above-named categories of surface distresses can constitute a performance indicator for purposes of pavement condition evaluation. For example, rutting is a common performance indicator that has been used to evaluate pavement condition in a significant number of studies (Hall, Correa, & Simpson, 2003;Irfan, Khurshid, & Labi, 2009;Labi, Lamptey, Konduri, & Sinha, 2005). However, given all the different types of distresses, choosing one type of distress to evaluate overall pavement condition may not be appropriate for making rehabilitation decisions.…”
Section: -30mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous maintenance data could be another approach to establish a systematic maintenance program. For instance, IRI threshold was acquired from the mean of past IRI values before the treatment, as seen in [8] - [11]. However, it could not clarify if the data was collected based only on engineering aspects or biased by politics, which could preempt the treatment decision.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%