Part 10: Paediatric basic and advanced life support

Caen, Allan R. de; Kleinman, Monica E.; Chameides, Leon; Atkins, Dianne L.; Berg, Robert A.; Berg, Marc D.; Bhanji, Farhan; Biarent, Dominique; Bingham, Robert; Coovadia, Ashraf; Hazinski, Mary Fran; Hickey, Robert W.; Nadkarni, Vinay; Reis, Amélia G.; Núñez, Antonio Rodríguez; Tibballs, James; Zaritsky, Arno; Zideman, David

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.028

Cited by 102 publications

(123 citation statements)

References 659 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

122

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In 2000, the AHA began collaborating with other resuscitation councils throughout the world, via the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), in a formal international process to evaluate resuscitation science. This process resulted in the publication of the International Consensus on CPR and ECC Science With Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) in 2005 and 2010 7 , 8 . These publications provided the scientific support for AHA Guidelines revisions in those years.…”

Section: Evidence Evaluation Process Informing This Guidelines Updatementioning

confidence: 99%

Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support

Caen¹,

Berg²,

Chameides³

et al. 2015

Circulation

Self Cite

433

188

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Evidence Evaluation Process Informing This Guidelines Updatementioning

confidence: 99%

Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support

Caen¹,

Berg²,

Chameides³

et al. 2015

Circulation

Self Cite

433

188

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Other retrospective or prospective studies had limited population size, and mixed OHCA and IHCA, cardiac and respiratory causes. Although hypothermia was still recommended in 2010 [56, 57], the latest recommendations by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) endorsed the latest trials and did not recommend any longer using hypothermia in children who remain comatose after resuscitation CA [58]. …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Targeted temperature management in the ICU: guidelines from a French expert panel

Cariou

Payen

Asehnoune

et al. 2017

Ann. Intensive Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the recent period, the use of induced hypothermia has gained an increasing interest for critically ill patients, in particular in brain-injured patients. The term “targeted temperature management” (TTM) has now emerged as the most appropriate when referring to interventions used to reach and maintain a specific level temperature for each individual. TTM may be used to prevent fever, to maintain normothermia, or to lower core temperature. This treatment is widely used in intensive care units, mostly as a primary neuroprotective method. Indications are, however, associated with variable levels of evidence based on inhomogeneous or even contradictory literature. Our aim was to conduct a systematic analysis of the published data in order to provide guidelines. We present herein recommendations for the use of TTM in adult and paediatric critically ill patients developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. These guidelines were conducted by a group of experts from the French Intensive Care Society (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française [SRLF]) and the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société Francaise d’Anesthésie Réanimation [SFAR]) with the participation of the French Emergency Medicine Association (Société Française de Médecine d’Urgence [SFMU]), the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies (Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques [GFRUP]), the French National Association of Neuro-Anesthesiology and Critical Care (Association Nationale de Neuro-Anesthésie Réanimation Française [ANARLF]), and the French Neurovascular Society (Société Française Neurovasculaire [SFNV]). Fifteen experts and two coordinators agreed to consider questions concerning TTM and its practical implementation in five clinical situations: cardiac arrest, traumatic brain injury, stroke, other brain injuries, and shock. This resulted in 30 recommendations: 3 recommendations were strong (Grade 1), 13 were weak (Grade 2), and 14 were experts’ opinions. After two rounds of rating and various amendments, a strong agreement from voting participants was obtained for all 30 (100%) recommendations, which are exposed in the present article.

show abstract

“…population was changed from "approximately 1/3 of the chest" to "at least 1/3 of the chest" [21,24,25,[27][28][29][30]. However, the term of "approximately" had not been completely removed from the guidelines, and "approximately 5 cm" or "approximately 4 cm" has been used since the 2010 guidelines were formulated.…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

“…International consensus of ILCOR Not evaluated At least 1/3 of the chest or approximately 4 cm [25] At least 1/3 of the chest or by 4 cm [26] ERC guideline Approximately 1/3 of the chest [27] At least 1/3 of the chest or approximately 4 cm [28] At least 1/3 of the chest or by 4 cm [9] AHA guideline Approximately 1/3-1/2 of the chest [21] At least 1/3 of the chest or approximately 4 cm [29] At least 1/3 of the chest or approximately 4 cm [10] AHA, American Heart Association; ERC, European Resuscitation Council; ILCOR, International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230687.t003…”

Section: 2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in the performance of resuscitation according to the resuscitation guideline terminology during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: “Approximately 4 cm” versus “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest”

Lee

Yang

2020

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of resuscitation guideline terminology on the performance of infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods A total of 40 intern or resident physicians conducted 2-min CPR with the two-finger technique (TFT) and two-thumb technique (TT) on a simulated infant cardiac arrest model with a 1-day interval. They were randomly assigned to Group A or B. The participants of Group A conducted CPR with the chest compression depth (CCD) target of "approximately 4 cm" and those of Group B conducted CPR with the CCD target of "at least one-third the anteriorposterior diameter of the chest". Single rescuer CPR was performed with a 15:2 compression to ventilation ratio on the floor. Results In both chest compression techniques, the average CCD of Group B was significantly deeper than that of Group A

show abstract

Part 10: Paediatric basic and advanced life support

Cited by 102 publications

References 659 publications

Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support

Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support

Targeted temperature management in the ICU: guidelines from a French expert panel

Differences in the performance of resuscitation according to the resuscitation guideline terminology during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: “Approximately 4 cm” versus “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest”

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About