1999
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75528-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial Replacement of Forage with Nonforage Fiber Sources in Lactating Cow Diets. I. Performance and Health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
11

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
19
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in all rations except 15WCGF more than 20% of the TMR was <1.18 mm. One of the concerns with replacing forages with nonforage fiber sources is the reduction in ration particle size and effective fiber and the resulting risk for acidosis, displaced abomasum, and milk fat depression (Pereira et al, 1999). In this experiment, rations with co-products appeared to have had a slightly finer particle size; however, there were no detected incidences of displaced abomasum or other digestive disorders, nor was milk fat synthesis (Table 4) affected by treatment diet.…”
Section: Feed Nutrient Composition and Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 69%
“…In addition, in all rations except 15WCGF more than 20% of the TMR was <1.18 mm. One of the concerns with replacing forages with nonforage fiber sources is the reduction in ration particle size and effective fiber and the resulting risk for acidosis, displaced abomasum, and milk fat depression (Pereira et al, 1999). In this experiment, rations with co-products appeared to have had a slightly finer particle size; however, there were no detected incidences of displaced abomasum or other digestive disorders, nor was milk fat synthesis (Table 4) affected by treatment diet.…”
Section: Feed Nutrient Composition and Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 69%
“…One of the concerns with replacing forages with nonforage fiber sources such as WDGS is the reduction in ration particle size and effective fiber, both of which increase the risk for acidosis, displaced abomasum, and milk fat depression (Pereira et al, 1999). Heinrichs and Kononoff (2002) suggested that rations should contain 2 to 8% on the top screen (>19.0 mm), 30 to 50% on the second screen (8.0 to 19.0 mm), 30 to 50% on the third screen (1.18 to 8.0 mm), and <20% in the bottom pan (<1.18 mm).…”
Section: Ration Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States corn producing region, almost all cultivated corn has dent grain (Coors et al, 1994), while the corn cultivated in Brazil is predominantly flint. There is evidence that the greater the grain vitreousness the lowest the ruminal starch degradability (Corrêa et al, 2002;Philippeau & MichaletDoreau, 1997;Philippeau et al, 1999). It is therefore important understanding the effect of corn grain texture on performance of dairy cows fed silages made with Brazilian cultivars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%