Participant-Proxy Reliability in Traumatic Brain Injury Outcome Research

Cusick, Christopher P.; Gerhart, Kenneth A.; Mellick, David

doi:10.1097/00001199-200002000-00012

Cited by 78 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The CIQ is objective and shows good reliability and validity (Corrigan and Demming, 1995;Seale et al, 2002;Willer et al, 1993Willer et al, , 1994Zhang et al, 2002). Sensitivity between individuals with a TBI versus other disabilities as well as typical adults have been well established (Corrigan and Demming, 1995;Cusick et al, 2000Cusick et al, , 2001Novack et al, 2000;Sander et al, 1997;Willer et al, 1993Willer et al, , 1994. Revised scoring procedures for the CIQ have been developed and validated, adding to the tool's strength (Kaplan, 2001;Sander et al, 1999).…”

Section: Community Integration Following Brain Injury 201mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several studies have examined the agreement between the individual's and significant other's reporting on level of CI (Cusick et al, 2000(Cusick et al, , 2001Ocampo et al, 1997;Sander et al, 1997;Te pper et al, 1996). The CIQ has also been shown to have good proxy subject agreement, which increases the utility with individuals who are severely disabled due to a brain injury (Cusick et al, 2000(Cusick et al, , 2001Sander et al, 1997).…”

Section: Community Integration Following Brain Injury 201mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The CIQ has also been shown to have good proxy subject agreement, which increases the utility with individuals who are severely disabled due to a brain injury (Cusick et al, 2000(Cusick et al, , 2001Sander et al, 1997). Other researchers have expressed caution in using the CIQ reporting of significant others (Ocampo et al, 1997;Tepper et al, 1996).…”

Section: Community Integration Following Brain Injury 201mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Appraising evidence on community integration following brain injury: a systematic review

Reistetter

Abreu

2005

Occup. Ther. Int.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A systematic review of the community integration (CI) literature for persons with traumatic brain injury was undertaken to evaluate: (1) How do we best measure CI? (2) Can we predict CI following rehabilitation? (3) Does social and activity participation have an effect on CI? (4) Does CI have an effect on quality of life/life satisfaction? Seventy-two articles were analysed. The results demonstrated: (1) strong evidence supporting the use of the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ), (2) mixed evidence supporting the ability to predict CI, with the prominent predictive variables being severity of injury, age, gender, education, prior work, living environment, cognition, emotional status, functional performance and disability. The literature search was restricted to articles published in English and the heterogeneity in the outcomes, methods, participants and other characteristics not reported. Further research is needed to examine the complex relationship of person, environment and CI.

show abstract

Section: Community Integration Following Brain Injury 201mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Community Integration Following Brain Injury 201mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Community Integration Following Brain Injury 201mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Appraising evidence on community integration following brain injury: a systematic review

Reistetter

Abreu

2005

Occup. Ther. Int.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Inversely, two studies reported patients overestimated their deficits in certain cognition and participation (Cusick et al, 2000;Malec, 2004). Given these contrasting results from previous studies, it becomes apparent that there are many factors contributing to differences in patient and informant ratings in addition to self-awareness.…”

mentioning

confidence: 91%

Rater Effect on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version in Traumatic Brain Injury

Wen¹,

Kay²,

A.³

2015

JPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the study was to investigate whether rater effect exists between self and informant-ratings on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult version (BRIEF-A) in individuals with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We recruited 90 individuals with moderate/severe TBI and 89 associated informants.Participants completed a series of assessments including the BRIEF-A. Self and associated informant ratings of the BRIEF-A were analyzed for rater effect using the Many-Facets Rasch Model. The adequate fit statistics indicated raters were not erratic; informants were more severe raters as indicated by significant fixed Chi-square (P < 0.01) and higher rater measure of informants on both Behavior Regulation Index (BRI) and Metacognition Index (MI). At the item level, seven items showed tendency of rater anditem interactions (P < 0.05), and two out of the seven items reached the significant rater and item interactions (P < 0.01). At these two items, the informants were more lenient; that is, they rated the patients as having less executive dysfunction than the patients' self-ratings. We suggested when calculating index scores in individuals with moderate to severe TBI, these two items should be excluded. The results of this study offered a guide to clinicians interpreting incongruent results of patient and informant ratings of the BRIEF-A in moderate to severe TBI.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, other psychometric studies using the CHART have reported reasonable results with different subjects (e.g. stroke survivors and people with traumatic brain injury) (Segal and Schall 1995;Cusick et al 2000). In Japan, the CHART-J has been applied for stroke survivors, and demonstrated good reliability as assessed by the results of test-retest.…”

mentioning

confidence: 94%

Reliability and Validity of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique for Japanese Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury

Tozato

Tobimatsu

Wang

et al. 2005

Tohoku J. Exp. Med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Participant-Proxy Reliability in Traumatic Brain Injury Outcome Research

Abstract: For many types of items, participant-proxy reliability is sufficient to merit the use of proxies in TBI outcome research when the participants are allowed to select their own proxy.

Cited by 78 publications

References 23 publications

Appraising evidence on community integration following brain injury: a systematic review

Appraising evidence on community integration following brain injury: a systematic review

Rater Effect on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version in Traumatic Brain Injury

Reliability and Validity of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique for Japanese Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About