2016
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/i2016-16168-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle identification in ALICE: a Bayesian approach

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
146
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
16
146
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where p 0 = 1.85 GeV and the parameters are given in Table III. The number of heavy quark is estimated to be dN c /dy ≃ 2 at RHIC and dN c /dy ≃ 15 at LHC, in agreement with the energy dependence of charm production cross section [64]. In the following calculation the charm quark mass used is m c = 1.3 GeV.…”
Section: Fireball and Parton Distributionssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…where p 0 = 1.85 GeV and the parameters are given in Table III. The number of heavy quark is estimated to be dN c /dy ≃ 2 at RHIC and dN c /dy ≃ 15 at LHC, in agreement with the energy dependence of charm production cross section [64]. In the following calculation the charm quark mass used is m c = 1.3 GeV.…”
Section: Fireball and Parton Distributionssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…[32]. The ALICE collaboration have also published the p T spectra of K * 0 , φ, Λ, Ξ and Ω at different centralities in p-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV [33,34,35]. However, the p T spectra of these particles in pp collisions at this energy are not available so far.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If as a first order approximation we assume that the E parameter of (25) is the average transverse momentum, p T of the given hadron species at a given CM energy, the value of the corresponding δ 2 parameters can be calculated, which can be used to test the strength of the correlation. On figure 2 the dashed lines are calculated with p T values measured by ALICE at √ s = 7 TeV [62]. The corresponding δ 2 = ∆n 2 / n 2 values are listed on this plot and in table 2.…”
Section: Unfolding Minimum Bias Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%