2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.elstat.2005.03.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle precipitation efficiency in an electrostatic precipitator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical and numerical research has been previously done on ESPs to predict the efficiency (Al-Hamouz & Abuzaid 2002;Cooperman 1971;Kocik et al 2005). In 1999, Kim & Lee (1999) did an experimental study and compared the results with theoretical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical and numerical research has been previously done on ESPs to predict the efficiency (Al-Hamouz & Abuzaid 2002;Cooperman 1971;Kocik et al 2005). In 1999, Kim & Lee (1999) did an experimental study and compared the results with theoretical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative corona discharge phenomena occur in a range of industrial applications, including spray painting in the automotive industry, ozone generation, and cleaning of toxic gases [6,8,11,12,14,16,26]. These applications are commonly treated using a one species model for the corona phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an electrostatic precipitator, which is an air cleaning device, charge that is created by ionization attaches to polluting particles which subsequently are guided towards the collecting plates [4e6, 8,11,12,14,19]. Furthermore, for the considered geometry, Alstom Power in V€ axj€ o, Sweden has performed measurements of the current density at the collector plates [4,5], which are used to validate the domain decomposition method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are very popular, especially the electrostatic precipitator (ESP). Because the smoke particles from wood combustion are in the submicron range and the concentration is variable, the most effective collection device technology is a corona discharge device or the ESP (Kalasee et al, 2003;Kocik et al, 2005;Tekasakul et al, 2006;Intra et al, 2007;Intra et al, 2010). Particle collection by this technique is advantageous because of its high collection efficiency (especially for small particles) and small pressure drop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many attempts have been made to use the ESP for removal of aerosol particles from biomass combustion (Kalasee et al, 2003;Kocik et al, 2005;Tekasakul et al, 2006;Intra et al, 2007;Kalasee 2009;Intra et al, 2010), the collection efficiency and electrode cleaning mechanisms still need to be improved. Most of the devices are operated in dry condition where the collected particles can be removed by rapping or hammering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%