2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particulates and noise exposure during bicycle, bus and car commuting: A study in three European cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
54
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
54
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrasts with the findings of Okokon et al [9], who observed a higher exposure to PM 2.5 for the CC with open windows than for public bus and bicycle and with Ham et al [23] who reported similar exposure for private cars and public buses. This could be due to differences in the traffic flow but mostly to vehicular fleet technology; while in Europe around 50% of total light duty vehicles are diesel-powered [26]; in the MCMA around 80% of the light duty vehicle fleet is petrol-powered [27].…”
Section: Personal Exposure To Pm 25 In the Mcmacontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This contrasts with the findings of Okokon et al [9], who observed a higher exposure to PM 2.5 for the CC with open windows than for public bus and bicycle and with Ham et al [23] who reported similar exposure for private cars and public buses. This could be due to differences in the traffic flow but mostly to vehicular fleet technology; while in Europe around 50% of total light duty vehicles are diesel-powered [26]; in the MCMA around 80% of the light duty vehicle fleet is petrol-powered [27].…”
Section: Personal Exposure To Pm 25 In the Mcmacontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The median exposure levels reported here for public buses and CC are lower than those reported in the MCMA by Vallejo et al [12] of 101.7 and 62.4 µg m −3 , respectively. However, the average exposure levels reported here are within the range of those reported by Okokon et al [9] (14 ± 5 to 85 ± 39 µg m −3 ) in three European cities for bicycle, public bus and car with open and closed windows. However, comparisons between on-field measurements and ground-based monitoring were not made.…”
Section: Personal Exposure To Pm 25 In the Mcmasupporting
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, recent findings suggest that in urban areas, a lack of time-activity patterns during pregnancy little influenced exposure estimates [75], although several existing studies reported that personal exposure levels varied in different commuting patterns (e.g. biking, taking a bus, and driving a car) [76,77]. Third, birth weight also increases a lot in last few weeks before delivery, but exposures after the 37th gestational week were not included in DLNMs because of the reasons listed above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important reason for this is the strong spatial variability of BC compared to PM 10 [4]. Most of the experiments focus on quantifying the differences between different commuting modes [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. General statistics by road type are provided by Dons and colleagues, showing relevant differences by road class, period of the day and period of the week [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%