2010
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m110.133553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partitioning of tRNA-dependent Editing between Pre- and Post-transfer Pathways in Class I Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases

Abstract: Hydrolytic editing activities are present in aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases possessing reduced amino acid discrimination in the synthetic reactions. Post-transfer hydrolysis of misacylated tRNA in class I editing enzymes occurs in a spatially separate domain inserted into the catalytic Rossmann fold, but the location and mechanisms of pre-transfer hydrolysis of misactivated amino acids have been uncertain. Here, we use novel kinetic approaches to distinguish among three models for pre-transfer editing by Escherich… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
178
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
13
178
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This assay possesses significant advantages over the conventional method that relies instead on radiolabeled amino acid: (1) The fraction of aminoacylable tRNA (plateau level) can be directly monitored by the ratio of substrate and product intensities on a thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plate; (2) the sensitivity of the assay is much higher, enabling the detection of even very weak aminoacylation levels; and (3) the use of unlabeled amino acid allows high and saturating concentrations of this substrate to be used. This assay is generally applicable to many and perhaps all aaRSs, including those that utilize nonstandard amino acid substrates, and yields precise measurements of steady-state and elementary rate constants for both cognate and misacylation reactions (Uter and Perona 2004;Hauenstein et al 2008;Ledoux and Uhlenbeck 2008;Dulic et al 2010). We describe now the further use of this assay to monitor precatalytic folding of the tRNA substrate, including the influence of posttranscriptional modifications on this process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assay possesses significant advantages over the conventional method that relies instead on radiolabeled amino acid: (1) The fraction of aminoacylable tRNA (plateau level) can be directly monitored by the ratio of substrate and product intensities on a thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plate; (2) the sensitivity of the assay is much higher, enabling the detection of even very weak aminoacylation levels; and (3) the use of unlabeled amino acid allows high and saturating concentrations of this substrate to be used. This assay is generally applicable to many and perhaps all aaRSs, including those that utilize nonstandard amino acid substrates, and yields precise measurements of steady-state and elementary rate constants for both cognate and misacylation reactions (Uter and Perona 2004;Hauenstein et al 2008;Ledoux and Uhlenbeck 2008;Dulic et al 2010). We describe now the further use of this assay to monitor precatalytic folding of the tRNA substrate, including the influence of posttranscriptional modifications on this process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, a coordinated zinc ion in the editing site of AlaRS may help provide specificity for non-cognate serine, which is larger than cognate alanine (20,21). Insights into the relative contributions of pre-and post-transfer editing have also begun to emerge in several Class I and Class II synthetase systems (22)(23)(24)(25)(26).Due to its unique side chain with special chemical properties, cysteine should be relatively easy for synthetases to discriminate. Similarly, proline is the only imino acid and would not be predicted to be especially problematic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A preponderance of posttransfer editing versus pretransfer editing can be dictated by a rapid aminoacyl-transfer step in the aminoacylation site (22,23,41). Likewise, the CP1 domain in IleRS relies upon pretransfer editing as its dominant editing pathway (42) because of a slow transfer rate (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both tRNA-dependent (20)(21)(22)(23) and tRNA-independent (22, 24) pretransfer editing activities have been reported. Also, clearance of the adenylate by selective ejection from the enzyme's active site into the aqueous environment has been suggested (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%