Partograph Utilization and Factors Associated with Poor Perinatal Outcomes in Wolaita Sodo University Referral Hospital, Southern Ethiopia

Abstract

Background: Maternal deaths remain a major public health problem worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended the use of modified WHO partograph to monitor labour and delivery, in order to improve delivery care and reduce maternal and perinatal mortality rate. Objective: This study was aimed to assess utilization of partograph and factors associated with perinatal outcomes among women who delivered at wolaita sodo university teaching referral hospital.Methods: A facility based cross-sectional study was conducted from September 10_25, 2015 by conducting partograph review. A total of was 309 partographs were included in the study by using simple random sampling technique from the total frame of women who gave birth in the last one year and whose delivery was followed by partographs. A Pre-tested and structured checklist was used to collect data. Discriptive analysis was conducted and tables and graphs and summary statistics were used to depict data. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to check for variables that show association with neonatal outcomes at P value of 0.05. Finally, multiple logitic regression was conducted to identify factors independantely associated with fetal outcomes. Odds ratio with 95% Confidence interval was used to claim for statistical significance. Results: Out of 309 total of charts reviewed, only for 58%, 3.2% and 2% of mothers monitoring of fetal heart rate, liquor status and molding was done respectively. Labour parameters (cervical dilation, station and uterine contractions) were monitored to the standard in 155(50%), 12(3.9%) and 170(55%) respectively. Apgar score at 5 th minute was ≥7 in 268(86.7%) neonates and resuscitatation was done in 65(21%). 46(14.9%) of neonates were admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) for special. Most of the mothers 287(92.9%) had good outcome and only 22(7.1%) of them developed immediate adverse outcomes: There were significant association (p<0.05) between perinatal outcomes and factors like neonatal resuscitations, Apgar score at 1 st minute and liquor quality.Conclusion: This study showed poor quality of partogragh utilizations; despite good perinatal and immediate maternal outcomes. Hence, responsible departments and offices should be encouraged to ensure proper partograph utilization.

Utilisation of partogram at a district in the North West Province, South Africa

“…Similarly, Jere ( 2014 :39) reported adverse neonatal outcomes of low Apgar scores and fresh stillbirths. These results are consistent with the research conducted by Rani et al ( 2016 :316) and Chemeda et al ( 2019 :36), which discovered that a noteworthy proportion of newborns were small for gestational age, had septicaemia, neonatal jaundice, low Apgar score and birth asphyxia. Appropriate application of the partogram allows for the diagnosis of prolonged and obstructed labour and decreases infant problems such as anoxia, infections, mortality and stillbirth risks (Dippenaar & Da Serra 2018 :399).…”

“…Similarly, Maphasha et al ( 2017 :84) confirmed that healthcare workers could not plot moulding, caput and FHR. This is consistent with the study conducted by Chemeda, Teklewold and Daka ( 2019 :36) with low standard recordings in mouldings (2%), liquor status (3.2%) and descent (3.9%). The foetal brain is protected from compression if the moulding is not increasing or excessive.…”

“…Poor and lack of recording especially blood pressure and urinalysis are of great concern as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, especially, preeclampsia may be undiagnosed in labour until women develop eclampsia. Okusanya et al ( 2018 :55) and Chemeda et al ( 2019 :42) confirmed that maternal temperatures and urine output were parameters that were not recorded at all during all phases of labour. The bladder should be emptied, and urine tested for glucose and ketones, as a full bladder can interfere with the progress of labour and ketosis is a sign of maternal starvation.…”

“…Similarly, Jere ( 2014 :39) revealed the same adverse maternal outcomes being caesarean section deliveries, PPH, genital infection and perineal trauma, though without any significant statistical differences. Chemeda et al ( 2019 :39) found that relatively few mothers experienced adverse outcomes, such as PPH or third-degree genital tears, and a very small proportion received a blood transfusion.…”