2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path Dependence or Path Creation?

Abstract: We discuss the assumptions that underlie path dependence, as defined by Vergne and Durand, and then provide the outlines of an alternative perspective which we label as path creation. Path creation entertains a notion of agency that is distributed and emergent through relational processes that constitute phenomena. Viewed from this perspective, 'initial conditions' are not given, 'contingencies' are emergent contexts for action, 'self-reinforcing mechanisms' are strategically manipulated, and 'lock-in' is but … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
274
1
16

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 599 publications
(296 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
274
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…This differing ability to use different sources of value creation is important (Chesbrough 2010). The background of a firm brings certain resources and routines with it, leading to a specific development path (Garud et al 2010). We presuppose path dependence to have a large impact on the process of creating a business model for the carsharing market, for which reason we expect differences between firms from different backgrounds.…”
Section: Business Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This differing ability to use different sources of value creation is important (Chesbrough 2010). The background of a firm brings certain resources and routines with it, leading to a specific development path (Garud et al 2010). We presuppose path dependence to have a large impact on the process of creating a business model for the carsharing market, for which reason we expect differences between firms from different backgrounds.…”
Section: Business Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, we add to the research on managing cleantech firms by exploring the signaling strategies developed by these types of firms. Secondly, we add to both signaling and technology entrepreneurship theory by describing types and effects of signaling in new entrants' search for legitimacy [20,21]. Formulated as propositions, our study's conclusions explicate signaling actions that entrepreneurs founding clean-tech start-ups undertake as they build companies and establish their legitimacy vis-à-vis resource providers and other actors from the established markets, in both early and late development stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Secondly, the technology of emerging industries is often under-developed. Technological standards are also emerging or even absent [21]. For example, the cleantech industry covers a wide range of sub-sectors: from solar power that is becoming increasingly legitimized to the wave energy sub-sector that still lacks commonly wide-spread technological standards [23,24].…”
Section: Building Legitimacy In Cleantech Firmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution space reveals how constrained regions or sectors are based on socio-economic, environmental and infrastructural factors to transition to sustainable and secure water use pathways (Brown et al, 2005;Garud et al, 2010). Within the solution space, sustainable and secure development pathways can be explored.…”
Section: Applications Of the Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%