2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path Learning in Individuals With Down Syndrome: The Floor Matrix Task and the Role of Individual Visuo-Spatial Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(170 reference statements)
2
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that 84% of participants with DS could return to home consistently, only slightly fewer than the number of TD children (96%; the difference was not statistically significant). These results demonstrating relatively preserved egocentric capacities in DS are also in agreement with findings from a recent study showing that individuals with DS performed as well as MA-matched TD children in reproducing an egocentric 1-to 7-step route (consisting of sequential moves forward, right or left) on a 4 × 4 floor matrix comprising 16 squares of 50 cm × 50 cm separated by 10 cm gaps, after either studying a map of the route or observing an experimenter take the same route (Meneghetti et al, 2020). Specifically, individuals with DS were able to reproduce an average of 3.00 steps after visualizing the trajectory on a map, while MA-matched TD children reproduced an average of 3.53 steps.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studies In Individuals With Dssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that 84% of participants with DS could return to home consistently, only slightly fewer than the number of TD children (96%; the difference was not statistically significant). These results demonstrating relatively preserved egocentric capacities in DS are also in agreement with findings from a recent study showing that individuals with DS performed as well as MA-matched TD children in reproducing an egocentric 1-to 7-step route (consisting of sequential moves forward, right or left) on a 4 × 4 floor matrix comprising 16 squares of 50 cm × 50 cm separated by 10 cm gaps, after either studying a map of the route or observing an experimenter take the same route (Meneghetti et al, 2020). Specifically, individuals with DS were able to reproduce an average of 3.00 steps after visualizing the trajectory on a map, while MA-matched TD children reproduced an average of 3.53 steps.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studies In Individuals With Dssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast, fewer studies have investigated the real-world spatial capacities of individuals with DS. In one study that assessed route learning, participants with DS performed as well as TD children, thus exhibiting similar or better performance than in virtual tasks (Meneghetti et al, 2020). In another study that assessed real-world allocentric spatial capacities, although participants with DS were impaired as compared to TD children at locating three reward locations in a paradigm that precluded the use of visual scene matching and egocentric spatial strategies, they were nonetheless capable of orienting in the arena using allocentric cues (Banta Lavenex et al, 2015), thus contradicting findings from virtual reality experiments.…”
Section: Real-world Spatial Capacitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the observation condition, both groups remembered sequences involving 3-4 steps, on average. These results are consistent with previous studies assessing individuals with DS on sequences of moves in vista space (with the Floor Matrix task; Meneghetti et al, 2020b) and TD 5-to 6-yearolds (with the Walking Corsi test; Piccardi et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Floor Matrix Task (Adapted From Meneghetti et al, 2020b) A 4 × 4 matrix on the floor consists of 16 squares (of stiff cardboard), each 50 × 50 cm in size, placed with a 10 cm gap between them to form a square layout covering ∼2.3 × 2.3 m. The task involves receiving information about sequences of positions in the matrix and then reproducing the sequences in the same order. The information was presented in two conditions: in one, participants watched the examiner make a series of moves to complete the sequence (Observation); in the other, they were given verbal indications (Oral instructions).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation