Patient involvement in pressure ulcer prevention and adherence to prevention strategies: An integrative review

Ledger, Lisa Jayne; Worsley, Peter; Hope, Joanna; Schoonhoven, Lisette

doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103449

Cited by 23 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Castro et al 23 notes that patients who are satisfied with well-designed education interventions are more likely to engage with the content and adopt new behaviours in their PIP care 50 . Therefore, patient participation improves safety and functioning 48,56 and increases confidence and satisfaction 24,36,37 when compared to reduced participation rates 45 .…”

Section: Patients' Ppipcb Satisfactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Research shows most patients are willing participants in their PIP care 7 such as decision-making and care planning [23][24][25] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Patients who participate in their care experience improved confidence, satisfaction and clinical outcomes 23,24,26 . The success of implementing any patient intervention increases when nurses are also involved in the process through working in partnership with patients to achieve mutual care goals 27,28 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

An education intervention care bundle to improve hospitalised patients’ pressure injury prevention knowledge: a before and after study

Deakin¹,

Gillespie²,

Chaboyer³

et al. 2020

WPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Patients' Ppipcb Satisfactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Research shows most patients are willing participants in their PIP care 7 such as decision-making and care planning [23][24][25] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An education intervention care bundle to improve hospitalised patients’ pressure injury prevention knowledge: a before and after study

Deakin¹,

Gillespie²,

Chaboyer³

et al. 2020

WPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[ 11 – 13 ] PIs prevention, considered as the most efficient method of dealing with PIs problems, is very complex, involving multiple interventions and processes and comprising numerous interacting components, and assessment of risk factors is the primary area of prevention measures. [ 14 – 16 ] Risk assessment is a central component of clinical practice aimed at identifying individuals susceptible to PIs in order to target appropriate interventions and prevent PIs development. [ 2 , 17 ] Degrees of mobility, perfusion, and skin status have been identified as the most common independent risk factors for the development of PIs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identification of risk factors of developing pressure injuries among immobile patient, and a risk prediction model establishment

Yang

Chen²,

Kang

et al. 2020

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Backgroud: Pressure injuries (PIs) bring a considerable physical and mental burden on immobile patients, and have put families and government under tremendous pressure to cover the cost of treatment. Therefore, this protocol proposes to identify risk factors of developing PIs in immobile patients from systematic reviews (SRs) and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), in order to establish a risk prediction model for developing PIs and identify individual risk factors that can be modified to aid prevention. Methods: Electronic databases and specific databases for CPGs and SRs will be searched. Study selection and data collection will be performed independently by two reviewers. All included SRs and CPGs will be subject to critical appraisal. RevMan 5.3 will be used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (ORP) after appraising the quality of eligible studies, and the risk predictive model will be established using logistic regression model. A narrative synthesis, evidence summary table, and Sankey diagram will also be performed. Results: The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. Conclusion: This systematic review will provide a risk prediction model of PI developing. INSPLAY registration number: INPLASY2020100097

show abstract

“…At United States, the economic budget of PUs arrays from 9.1 to 11.6 billion dollars each year. The total budget at the UK related PU treatment from 1999-2000 was 1.4 to 2.1 billion pounds per year (Ledger et al, 2020). A current systematic review debated that the treatment cost of PU higher than prevention.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Application Bundle Skin Care on Nurses’ Performance and Orthopedic Patients’ Skin Outcome: Quasi-Experimental Study

Elasrag¹,

Elsabagh²,

Salih³

et al. 2020

ijrps

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Treating severe pressure ulcers may consume considerable manpower, time, and medical resources. Pressure ulcers can be avoided and effectively treated when nurses conduct proper skin assessment and care for wounds appropriately. Research hypothesis: There was positive impact of bundle skincare training on nurses' performance and orthopedic patients' skin outcome. quasi-experimental design was utilized at orthopedic units at Shebin El Koum teaching Hospital and Menofia University Hospital. Tools used for data collection were Pre-designed Questionnaire contained on nurses' characteristics, Attitude Rating Scale and Nurses' knowledge, also used Observational Checklist and BRADEN scale. The subject composed of 45 nurses and 90 orthopedic patients. Mean score of total knowledge pre-intervention was 6.83±3.1, while at the post was 9.95±2.1. Also, a mean score of total practice pre-intervention was 7.11±2.6, while at the post was 11.83±3.4, and, a mean score of total attitude pre-intervention was 5.02±2.8, while at the post was 7.82±1.9. Mean score of BRADEN scale at pre-intervention was 12.81±3.04, while at the post was 13.45±1.99. Application bundle skin care had a positive effect on nurses' knowledge, practice and attitude related skincare for orthopedic patients. So, there was an improvement at BRADEN score of patients post-application bundle skincare. Age, gender and previous hospitalization, BMI, and length had positive predictor effect on pressure sore risk. Skincare bundle for orthopedic patients is acceptable and has the potential to improve nursing care.

show abstract

Patient involvement in pressure ulcer prevention and adherence to prevention strategies: An integrative review

Cited by 23 publications

References 25 publications

An education intervention care bundle to improve hospitalised patients’ pressure injury prevention knowledge: a before and after study

An education intervention care bundle to improve hospitalised patients’ pressure injury prevention knowledge: a before and after study

Identification of risk factors of developing pressure injuries among immobile patient, and a risk prediction model establishment

Effect of Application Bundle Skin Care on Nurses’ Performance and Orthopedic Patients’ Skin Outcome: Quasi-Experimental Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About