Patient Involvement in Shared Decision-Making: Do Patients Rate Physicians and Nurses Differently?

Abstract

Background. Shared decision-making implies that patients and healthcare professionals make decisions together about clinical exams, available treatments, choice of options, and the benefit or downside of every choice. Patients involved in the shared decision-making process are more compliant with treatments and have a reduced risk of complications related to the pathology. In Italy, patient involvement in caring processes is still barely investigated. Aim. To investigate patients’ perceptions about shared decision-making with physicians and nurses, respectively, and to examine the relationship between shared decision-making and patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care/treatment. Methods. The study was performed between March and June 2019 in two wards of one Italian hospital. A questionnaire was administered to inpatients at the time of admission and again at discharge, including demographic information and measurement scales regarding patient involvement in shared decision-making, patient satisfaction, and perceived quality of treatment/care. Results. A total of 151 out of 301 patients completed questionnaires at both admission and discharge. Patients’ scores for shared decision-making (information, patient needs, treatment planning) were significantly different for physicians and nurses. At both admission and discharge, patients rated shared decision-making significantly higher for physicians compared to nurses, while there were no differences in their satisfaction ratings. Patient ratings of physicians did not change from admission (information: mean (M) = 3.50, standard deviation (SD) = 0.81; patient need: M = 3.05, SD = 1.05; treatment planning: M = 2.75, SD = 1.23) to discharge (information: M = 3.50, SD = 0.79; patient need: M = 3.17, SD = 1.02; treatment planning: M = 2.66, SD = 1.23) (p = 0.924, p = 0.098, p = 0.293, respectively), but patients’ ratings of nurses’ behavior increased significantly from admission (information: M = 2.44, SD = 1.23; patient need: M = 2.27, SD = 1.17; treatment planning: M = 2.12, SD = 1.19) to discharge (information: M = 2.62, SD = 1.22; patient need: M = 2.53, SD = 1.24; treatment planning: M = 2.35, SD = 1.21) (p = 0.019, p = 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). Attention to patients’ needs was the key determinant of both satisfaction with nurses (OR = 3.65, 95% CI = 1.31–10.14, p = 0.013) and perceived quality of care (OR = 3.97, 95% CI = 1.49–10.55, p = 0.006). Providing appropriate information about disease progress and treatments was a key determinant of both satisfaction with physicians (OR = 19.75, 95% CI = 7.29–53.55, p < 0.001) and perceived quality of treatment (OR = 8.03, 95% CI = 3.25–19.81, p < 0.001). Discussion. Nurses should be sensitized to involving patients in the decision-making process, especially upon hospital admission. Specific training about effective communication techniques can be implemented to manage relationships with patients in different caring situations. Practical implications and future directions are discussed.

Effect of comprehensive nursing care for the liver cancer patients undergoing interventional therapy in China: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…This can encourage patients to take an active role in their care, thereby enhancing their sense of control, reducing anxiety, and promoting better coping strategies. Moreover, an informed patient may be better equipped to manage potential complications, leading to improved health-related quality of life and potentially reducing hospital readmissions (Galletta et al, 2022).…”

“…Secondly, comprehensive nursing care aims to facilitate informed decision-making, aiding patients in understanding their disease, treatment options and potential side effects (Galletta et al, 2022). This can encourage patients to take an active role in their care, thereby enhancing their sense of control, reducing anxiety, and promoting better coping strategies.…”

Exploring the medical decision-making patterns and influencing factors among the general Chinese public: a binary logistic regression analysis

“…This collaborative approach aligns with SDM frameworks like Elwyn et al's "three-talk model" and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, which focus on structured decision-making phases and informed deliberation [ 10 , 42 ]. The significance of such collaborative models, especially SDM, is underscored by research from Pieterse AH et al [ 16 , 38 ]. These studies highlight the crucial role of patient-physician collaboration and explore the challenges and facilitators encountered in implementing SDM across varied healthcare settings.…”

Patients' experiences of shared decision‐making in nursing care: A qualitative study

“…A quantitative Italian study showed that less than half of the patients indicated that nurses provided the necessary information. Additionally, patients indicated that nurses should be sensitised to involve patients in the decision‐making process (Galletta et al., 2022). In the Netherlands, where SDM has received much attention—including through a national campaign called ‘To Decide Together’—behavioural and cultural change in decision‐making is still ongoing (Van Der Weijden et al., 2022).…”