Patient privacy and autonomy: a comparative analysis of cases of ethical dilemmas in China and the United States

Abstract

Background Respect for patients’ autonomy is usually considered to be an important ethical principle in Western countries; privacy is one of the implications of such respect. Healthcare professionals frequently encounter ethical dilemmas during their practice. The past few decades have seen an increased use of courts to resolve intractable ethical dilemmas across both the developed and the developing world. However, Chinese and American bioethics differ largely due to the influence of Chinese Confucianism and Western religions, respectively, and there is a dearth of comparative studies that explore cases of ethical dilemmas between China and the United States. Methods This paper discusses four typical cases with significant social impact. First, it compares two cases concerning patient privacy: the “Shihezi University Hospital Case”, in which a patient was used as a clinical teaching object without her permission, and the “New York-Presbyterian Hospital Case”, in which the hospital allowed the filming of a patient’s treatment without his consent. Second, it compares two cases regarding patient autonomy and potentially life-saving medical procedures: the “Case of Ms. L”, concerning a cohabitant’s refusal to sign a consent form for a pregnant woman’s caesarean, and the “Case of Mrs. V”, concerning a hospital’s insistence upon a blood transfusion for a dissenting patient. This paper introduces the supporting and opposing views for each case and discusses their social impact. It then compares and analyses the differences between China and the United States from cultural and legislative perspectives. Conclusions Ethical dilemmas have often occurred in China due to the late development of bioethics. However, the presence of bioethics earlier in the US than in China has not spared the US of ethical dilemmas. This paper highlights lessons and inspiration from the cases for healthcare professionals and introduces readers to the role and weight of privacy and autonomy in China and in the US from the perspectives of different cultures, religions and laws.

Chinese Clinical Ethicists Accept Physicians’ Benevolent Deception of Patients

“…In sum, we agree with Meyers (2021) that sometimes kindness, compassion, and a commitment to avoid harm should prevail over strict allegiance to truth-telling, under the condition that deception is the best choice among all bad choices available.…”

“…In "Deception and the Clinical Ethicist," Meyers (2021) defends the argument that the clinical ethicist should sometimes be an active participant in the deception of patients and their families. Meyers also expresses the point that in some cultures it may be acceptable, even obligatory, for a family to take on medical decision-making, deceptively protecting the patient from some "burden."…”

“…Family members unite to solve problems for each individual member. This kind of family-based decision-making can enhance a sense of obligation, deepen feelings, and promote harmony among family members (Zhang et al 2021) and is usually given first priority in everyday affairs. Moreover, as most Chinese people hold no religious beliefs, the idea of death is often devastating for patients, and disclosure of a cancer diagnosis can even cause a breakdown (Gan et al 2018).…”

“…The opening sentence of Christopher Meyers' Target Article is "Lying to one's patient is wrong" (Meyers 2021). The author continues, "This truism is one that bioethicists have heartedly endorsed for several decades."…”

Contingency Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: An Analysis Based on a New Ethical Framework

“…However, the importance assigned to particular ethical values may vary according to cultural background. Unlike Western culture, which takes greater pride in freedom and democracy, traditional Chinese culture usually emphasizes collectivism and cohesion (Zhang et al 2021). We believe that providing more opportunities to engage stakeholders in the decisionmaking process could promote the procedural value of "inclusivity" in China.…”