2021
DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-reported outcome measures in cardiovascular disease

Abstract: In today's medical ecosystem, it is vital to measure the outcomes that are most important to the patients. As such, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMS) can be an essential metric to deliver high-quality cardiovascular care, particularly in the subset of patients who remain disappointed with their outcomes. PROMS should be a reproducible and reflective report of what is fundamental to a patient over time and across treatments with proper standards in the analysis, interpretation, and re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monitoring potential HRQoL changes requires measurement instruments to be sensitive and relevant. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are one way of capturing a recipient’s journey, and the impact of the LVAD on their HRQoL [ 10 ]. PROMs are self-reported questionnaires that evaluate a person’s health and HRQoL from their perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring potential HRQoL changes requires measurement instruments to be sensitive and relevant. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are one way of capturing a recipient’s journey, and the impact of the LVAD on their HRQoL [ 10 ]. PROMs are self-reported questionnaires that evaluate a person’s health and HRQoL from their perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strength is the use of comprehensive measurement by use of standardised disease-specific and generic health instruments. 33 Generally, a disease-specific measure is more sensitive (in this case for cardiovascular outcomes), while a generic measure taps the patient's overall health. 34 Our study should be viewed in the light of several limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we compare the generic quality of life data to available comparators from the general population. Another strength is the use of comprehensive measurement by use of standardised disease-specific and generic health instruments 33. Generally, a disease-specific measure is more sensitive (in this case for cardiovascular outcomes), while a generic measure taps the patient’s overall health 34…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though it is well accepted that delivering an adequate and understandable patient IC constitutes an integral part of the procedure for legal - but above all - for ethical reasons [5] , our data confirm profound limitations of the current IC practice before coronary angiography and PCI: A substantial proportion of patients in the Control group felt insufficiently informed about the planned procedure and claimed a low quality of and satisfaction with the obtained Patient IC. The importance of these patient-centered variables as indicators for high-quality cardiovascular medicine is increasingly recognized bringing PROMs, next to “hard” medical outcome data, into focus in future cardiovascular research [6] . In contrast to the current IC practice which confronts patients with long and complex text, graphic narratives, using illustrations in juxtaposition with simple text [7] , may increase patient satisfaction and comfort by conveying complex information in a concise manner independent of cultural and educational background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%