Patient reported outcomes in a large cohort of patients receiving osteopathic care in the United Kingdom

Abstract

Objective The use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to evaluate care is being advocated increasingly in clinical settings. Electronic data capture is both resource and environmentally friendly and convenient. This purpose of this study was to test and implement a nationwide system to collect routine PROM data from osteopathic patients using a web and mobile app. Methods A prospective study design was used to monitor outcomes of care for patients attending osteopathic clinics. Demographic and service data were collected, the primary outcomes were the Bournemouth Questionnaire and a Global Rating of Change score. Data concerning patients’ satisfaction and experience of care were collected also. Data were collected at baseline, one week, and six weeks post-treatment. Results A total of 1721 patients completed the PROM app questionnaire. The majority (65.8%) of patients who used the PROM app were between 40 and 69 years old with 11% being 70 years and over. At baseline 39.8% of patients reported they’d had their symptoms for 13 weeks or more. Low back pain was the most common symptom (55.8%). Patients reported high scores for both satisfaction and experience of osteopathic care: 88.1% were very satisfied at six weeks post-baseline and 93.5% reported very good experience at six weeks post-baseline. Data from the Global Rating of Change scale indicated that at one week post-baseline 89.1% of patients reported some measure of improvement, and at six weeks this figure rose to 92.8%. The mean sum score for the Bournemouth Questionnaire went from 30.8 at baseline to 13.3 at six weeks post-baseline. This represented a significant and clinically meaningful positive change score of 56.8%. Conclusion The app was well-completed and the data very encouraging. These data will help to form the basis for standards of care for patients attending osteopathic practices.

Exploring lumbo-pelvic functional behaviour patterns during osteopathic motion tests: A biomechanical (en)active inference approach to movement analysis

“…In the field of osteopathy, positional and joint motion tests are widely used [9][10][11][12][13] even if controversies remain on their relevance compared to pain provocation tests [14]. When exploring the motion of the lumbo-pelvic complex, tests such as the standing flexion test, sacral springing, the Stork/Gillet test and the one-sided tilt test (hip drop test) are commonly used in manual assessment [15][16][17][18].…”

Should person-centredness care be an affordable goal in French osteopathic education?

“…An example of such a tool is the use of patient reported outcomes measures (PROM), that has been advocated by the UK to globally evaluate practices [49,50]. However, more tailored assessment could be appropriate to osteopathic practice.…”