2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient size as a parameter for determining Diagnostic Reference Levels for paediatric Computed Tomography (CT) procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ADs for paediatric CT were also put forward in this survey. Unlike DRLs which is to avoid the patients from unnecessary exposure, ADs can serve as a benchmark for dose optimisation given that 50% of the doses can be lower than ADs in medical practice [18]. ADs can provide greater optimisation potential for CT doses, and a 60% reduction in average dose was achievable in this survey if ADs were followed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ADs for paediatric CT were also put forward in this survey. Unlike DRLs which is to avoid the patients from unnecessary exposure, ADs can serve as a benchmark for dose optimisation given that 50% of the doses can be lower than ADs in medical practice [18]. ADs can provide greater optimisation potential for CT doses, and a 60% reduction in average dose was achievable in this survey if ADs were followed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the CTDI vol and DLP based on DRLs, the concept of size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs) [19] which consider the size of paediatric patients has been used to estimate the dose of CT in many countries, as a new method to summarise the DRLs of paediatric CT [10][11][12]. Recently, some studies in Asia have also indicated that patient size as a factor may better reflect dose levels [18,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. The method of SSDE may can be introduced into the further study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to patient shape and size difference, the above metrics are not sufficient to accurately estimate the actual patient dose. Specifically, the doses of patients smaller than the standard acrylic phantoms are underestimated 18–20 . This leads to an underestimation of the dose for average‐sized adults and paediatric by 40–70% 21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the doses of patients smaller than the standard acrylic phantoms are underestimated. 18 , 19 , 20 This leads to an underestimation of the dose for average‐sized adults and paediatric by 40–70%. 21 To address this concern, conversion factors to acquire size‐specific dose estimates (SSDEs) for specific patients have been suggested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%