2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(03)90413-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

20
82
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
20
82
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that Level B was the most common (44.7%). This is in agreement with Quek et al 6 (80%), Sandhu and Kaur 20 (39%) and Padhye et al 2 (45.8%). Level A impaction was found to be more common in studies of Hattab et al 4 (58%) and Gupta et al 7 (61.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our results showed that Level B was the most common (44.7%). This is in agreement with Quek et al 6 (80%), Sandhu and Kaur 20 (39%) and Padhye et al 2 (45.8%). Level A impaction was found to be more common in studies of Hattab et al 4 (58%) and Gupta et al 7 (61.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our method for determining the angular position was based on incorporating a system of measurements using a protractor to avoid errors arising from visual impression and to enable reproducibility of the results, a method commonly adopted in many studies. 2,6,20,21 Our results showed that 34.6% of third molars were mesioangular in position. This number is considerably lower than that reported by Hattab et al 4 (50%) Quek et al 6 (60%) and Kruger et al 22 (62.9%), but higher in proportion than that obtained by Byahatti and Ingafou 21 (23.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 3 more Smart Citations