1989
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4655(89)90257-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PAW, a general-purpose portable software tool for data analysis and presentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
43
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
6
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, that refers only to the central values; taking into account the uncertainties, the data are almost equally consistent with the hypothesis that the 16 O cross sections are larger, as one would expect from simple geometry. The only other unexpected trend in these data is the slight decrease of the 20 Ne cross sections for aluminum and heavier targets at 600 MeV/nucleon compared to the 400 MeV/nucleon data. The effect is only slightly larger than the combined one-sigma uncertainties and we do not believe it has any physical significance.…”
Section: Charge-changing Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, that refers only to the central values; taking into account the uncertainties, the data are almost equally consistent with the hypothesis that the 16 O cross sections are larger, as one would expect from simple geometry. The only other unexpected trend in these data is the slight decrease of the 20 Ne cross sections for aluminum and heavier targets at 600 MeV/nucleon compared to the 400 MeV/nucleon data. The effect is only slightly larger than the combined one-sigma uncertainties and we do not believe it has any physical significance.…”
Section: Charge-changing Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Agreement between the hydrogen-target cross sections is generally good, but it is not good for several of the carbon-target results. Specifically, the cross sections for oxygen beams on carbon targets do not agree well, and the results for 20 Ne on carbon at 400 MeV/nucleon differ by about 8%. The discrepancies are all well beyond the stated uncertainties from either group.…”
Section: A Comparison To Previous Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…entering in it were fitted using the CERN computer program PAW [39] to reproduce the experimental deuteron energy spectra. The fit parameters that had to be considered in this analysis were: Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Deuteron Energy Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%